Skip to content

Only Foreign Entities Need to Report Under the CTA

March 25, 2025

On March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the Treasury Department, issued a new interim final rule on reporting under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The new rule drastically narrows the scope of reporting under the CTA to apply only to foreign entities that register to do business in the U.S.  No entities formed in the U.S. will be required to report.

Only entities formed in a foreign country that directly register to do business in the U.S. are required to file a beneficial ownership information report (BOIR). For existing foreign entities registered to do business in the U.S., a BOIR is due within 30 days of publication of the new interim final rule in the federal register. For foreign entities that subsequently register to do business in the U.S., a BOIR is due within 30 days of such registration.  Beneficial owners of a foreign reporting company who are U.S. persons will not be required to submit beneficial ownership information in a foreign entity BOIR. If a foreign reporting company has only U.S. beneficial owners, then the foreign reporting company will be exempt from filing a BOIR.

The interim final rule and its supporting memorandum do not make clear what will happen to the existing BOIR reports that have previously been filed by domestic entities or who will continue to have access to these BOIRs.  However, the new rule makes clear that no subsequent reporting to correct a BOIR or to file an initial BOIR is required by any domestic entities at this time.

The CTA statute as codified at 35 U.S.C. § 5336 contains reporting requirements for domestic entities and specifically exempts only certain domestic entities (large companies, nonprofits, insurance, securities brokers, etc.). The new interim final rule relies on statutory text in the CTA delegating power to the Treasury Secretary to exempt certain entities to exclude all domestic entities from reporting.  The Treasury Department’s role in promulgating regulations under the statute is to implement the CTA. Because the law is clearly intended to apply to both domestic and foreign entities and the interim final rule swallows the statute by only requiring foreign entities to report, the new rule may draw a legal challenge as an unreasonable interpretation of the statute.

The new rule will be open to comment for 60 days after publication in the federal register.  FinCEN intends to issue a final rule later this year.  Under the new rule, the CTA will only apply to foreign entities.  However, it will require legislative action to permanently change the reporting requirements to only apply to foreign entities. It is possible that the Trump administration will work with Congress to introduce new legislation to limit the application of the CTA to only foreign entities. However, without a change in the statute, CTA reporting requirements for domestic entities may reemerge in the future.

There are also a number of continuing lawsuits at both the district court and appellate level challenging the constitutionality of the CTA. Clark Hill’s CTA Task Force will continue to monitor for updates to the CTA and is available to counsel clients on reporting and compliance requirements.

 

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more