Smart results,
delivered simply.
Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business.
Our Values
Clark Hill is built upon a core set of values that guide us in our relationships with our clients, our interactions with each other, and our connection to the communities in which we serve.
Transatlantic Services
Our transatlantic team comprises experienced attorneys and consultants from both sides of the Atlantic who are committed to helping companies establish, grow, and prosper on the international stage.
Clark Hill Voices
Enjoy conversations between our attorneys and professionals in a variety of industries.
News & Events
Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas
Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.
Can an Employee Resist Submitting Their Claim into Arbitration by Using Another Employee’s Unfavorable Arbitration Outcome? The Ninth Circuit Held – No.
In O’Dell v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc., the Ninth Circuit addressed whether plaintiffs can use a procedural mechanism, non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel, to avoid enforcement of arbitration agreements—and held they cannot. The decision carries significant implications for employers facing multi-plaintiff claims.
USCIS Announces Enhanced Security Vetting and Adjudication Pause Updates
Effective April 27, 2026, USCIS implemented a new, enhanced security vetting process that has resulted in temporary “holds” on adjudications requiring fingerprint-based background checks. While not formally characterized as a blanket pause, the new process has delayed the issuance of approvals across numerous case types, including adjustment of status, asylum, naturalization, family-based petitions, humanitarian applications, and employment-based filings.
CIT Strikes Down Section 122 Tariffs: Big Holding, Narrow Relief, and a Refund Map for Importers
On May 7, 2026, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) held that President Trump exceeded the statutory authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 when he imposed the Administration’s temporary 10 percent “balance‑of‑payments” tariffs earlier this year.