Eldridge  lisa

Lisa C. Eldridge

Senior Counsel


Two Commerce Square
2001 Market St, Suite 2620
Philadelphia, PA 19103


210 Carnegie Center
Suite 102
Princeton, NJ 08540
Vcard icon Email icon Pdf icon
Fax: 215.640.8501
Fax: 609.785.2999
Social Media
J.D., University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1991
B.A., magna cum laude, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York, 1988, Phi Beta Kappa
State Bar Licenses
New Jersey
Court Admissions
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Pennsylvania
U.S. District Ct., District of New Jersey
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Wisconsin

Lisa C. Eldridge

Senior Counsel

Lisa Carney Eldridge is a litigator in Clark Hill's complex civil litigation practice and employment litigation practice. Lisa's experience includes a wide range of commercial litigation and employment-related matters. She has represented clients in breach of contract claims, commercial fraud and business tort litigation, managed care litigation, ERISA employee benefits litigation and employment discrimination claims, RICO and insurance fraud/liquidation recovery, real property claims, class action litigation, non-compete agreements, and insurance law. Lisa has also litigated a variety of transportation matters including cases involving federal preemption and removal issues. She regularly counsels clients on issues relating to actual or anticipated litigation related to employment claims and breach of pension and benefit plans as well as internal fraud investigations. On behalf of clients, Lisa has managed bench and jury trials, injunction hearings, and arbitrations. She has also argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as well as in various federal and state courts.

Lisa was a recipient of the “40 Under 40” Award in the Philadelphia Business Journal in May 2002 for dynamic "up and comers" in their profession. Since then, Lisa has continued to successfully handle numerous business disputes and often manages complex civil litigation with multiple parties with significant discovery and motion practice.


  • Presenter, “Planning for Reduction in Force/Change in Control and Severance Issues,” Business Lawyers’ Institute 2009, November 2009.
  • Presenter, “Handling Your First Discrimination or Wrongful Termination Case,” PBI’s 14th Annual Business Lawyers’ Institute, November 2008.
  • "Cashing in on Part-Time: Win-Win Suggestions for Lawyers and their Employers,” The ABA Woman Advocate Newsletter, Winter 2004 edition.
Recipient, "40 Under 40" Award, Philadelphia Business Journal, 2002
Commissioner and Coach, Main Line Girls Basketball Association, 2005-present
Planning Committee and Presenter, PBI Lawyers Institute, 2007-present
Volunteer, Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation, 2005-present
Philadelphia Bar Association
Pennsylvania Bar Association

Clark Hill’s defense counsel team which included Mel Karfis, Stephanie Anderson, Bishop Bartoni, Vince Roskovensky, and Lisa Eldridge recently obtained a directed verdict in a treestand products liability jury trial pending in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania (Harrisburg, PA).  Plaintiff fell 30 feet from a treestand sustaining serious injuries rendering him a paraplegic.  Plaintiff alleged that a treestand sold by the client/retailer failed to provide all the necessary components to safely install and use the treestand.  Defendant responded that it did provide all the necessary components that would have been supplied by the manufacturer.  Defendant further argued that even if the Plaintiff did not receive all the necessary parts and components, Plaintiff had full  knowledge that he was allegedly missing parts and made a conscious decision to replace various components with unauthorized replacements.  During trial, defense counsel effectively cross-examined the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s fact witnesses, as well as the Plaintiff’s engineers.  After the close of the Plaintiff’s proofs, Defendant moved for directed verdict alleging that Plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case that the client/retailer sold a defective treestand and, in the alternative, the Plaintiff had assumed the risk because cross-examination at trial had revealed the Plaintiff had full knowledge that he was alleging missing vital components and knowingly used unauthorized replacement parts in an improper manner causing his fall.  The trial court agreed and granted Defendants’ motion for directed verdict dismissing the case.

After 3 ½ years, the dogged prosecution of nine separate federal and state lawsuits In Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and two late night closings, all involving seemingly intractable fraudulent transfer and lien priority issues, a multi-disciplinary team of Clark Hill lawyers recently concluded a massive commercial loan work-out for our Bank client that resulted in the recovery of substantially the entire eight figure, 10 year old debt owed by the Bank’s most recalcitrant borrower, with significant contributions from his foreign partners.