Skip to content

The Trump Administration's crypto regulatory roadmap takes shape

September 15, 2025

The government just gave us a clearer picture of where crypto regulation is headed under the new Trump administration. On Sept. 4, the Office of Management and Budget released its Spring 2025 Unified Agenda, which is essentially the federal government’s twice-yearly preview of what regulatory changes are coming down the pipeline.

This particular edition was delayed due to the presidential transition, but it was worth the wait for anyone following crypto policy. The agenda reveals that the SEC is working on several crypto-related rule proposals that could change how digital assets operate in the U.S.

First up, the SEC is looking at amending the Exchange Act Rules to account for trading of crypto assets on alternative trading systems (ATSs) and national securities exchanges. If advanced, these amendments could clarify the relationship between traditional securities exchanges and the growing digital asset systems.

The second piece focuses on custody rules, which are the regulations that govern the custody of advisory clients and fund assets. Establishing clear guardrails around the custody of digital assets by registered investment advisors and other regulated entities is extremely important in this nascent industry due to the nature of digital assets themselves. In the event of a critical custody failure that results in a loss, it is entirely possible that the affected digital assets will never be recovered. And that places a heavy burden on those who custody digital assets on behalf of their clients. The new or updated rule will address crypto assets in each case.

The third proposal is perhaps the most significant: potential new rules on how crypto assets can be offered and sold. The SEC says it’s considering including exemptions and safe harbors to help clarify the regulatory framework for crypto assets and provide greater certainty to the market. For an industry that’s operated in regulatory limbo for years, this could be game-changing. Alongside this, Congress is still considering the CLARITY Act, which is the legislative effort to develop a comprehensive market structure for digital assets, including the regulation of their offer and sale. It remains to be seen whether the SEC will push forward with rulemaking under its present legislative authority or if it will wait for further direction from Congress.

These aren’t final rules yet. In fact, the agencies seeking to establish these rules generally must first release a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, as required by statute. From there, industry participants and the general public will have an opportunity to endorse or oppose the proposed agency action. Anyone involved in the crypto space should be preparing for what is to come. If you are an industry participant or otherwise interested party that wants to help shape these critical regulations, please reach out to Bryan Jacoutot or Kristina Aleksanyan at Clark Hill.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Using “Schedule A” Litigation to Combat Online Trademark Infringement

In today’s digital world, trademark infringement is a significant concern for businesses aiming to protect their brand identity. Accordingly, it is important for businesses to implement a multifaceted online enforcement strategy to protect their intellectual property rights. Among the various legal avenues available to combat counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks, “Schedule A” lawsuits, which are most often filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, have emerged as a powerful tool. As intellectual property attorneys at Clark Hill, we regularly help businesses secure and enforce their IP rights. Here, we will explore what Schedule A trademark infringement litigation entails, how it works, and why it’s essential for companies to understand this avenue for enforcing their legal rights.

Explore more