Skip to content

Clark Hill Obtains Class Certification for Plaintiff in Child Sex Trafficking Class Action Against World’s Largest Pornography Website

December 22, 2023

Clark Hill’s Kevin Kent, Mark Schoeller, and Vanessa Huber obtained class certification in a child sex trafficking class action matter against Pornhub, the world’s largest pornography website, on Dec. 19 in an Alabama federal district court.

The class action involves claims of child sex trafficking under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and federal child pornography laws alleging that the owners and operators of PornHub have victimized Plaintiff and more than 20,000 other minors by disseminating child sexual abuse material (“CSAM”) on their websites.

“We’re grateful for the Court’s decision to certify the class of Plaintiffs and plan to hold Pornhub accountable for their actions,” Schoeller said.

In Doe v. MG Freesites LTD, et al., Plaintiff was a minor when she was drugged and raped in Alabama by a man who uploaded videos of the sexual assault to PornHub, where they were viewed hundreds of times and accessible to PornHub’s users throughout the world.

In discussing the benefits of class treatment for the highly traumatized victims of CSAM, Judge L. Scott Coogler noted that “certifying a class also helps more vulnerable CSAM victims come forward with their claims and potentially receive relief than might otherwise come forward individually.”

The district court certified both an injunctive relief class to modify PornHub’s business practices and a damages class seeking statutory, actual, and punitive damages.  Kent, Schoeller, and Huber of Clark Hill’s Philadelphia office represent the Plaintiff and the class of child sex trafficking survivors, along with a team of lawyers from other firms and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

“We have a responsibility to get justice for those harmed and exploited. This will continue to be a collaborative effort with partners from around the country to stop these unlawful practices,” Schoeller said.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more
Legal Updates

EPA’s New Turbine Rules Provide Air Permitting Relief for Data Centers

EPA’s Jan. 15, 2026 NSPS for combustion turbines may cut Title V permits, add NOx controls, and define temporary or mobile turbines affecting data centers nationwide.

Explore more