Skip to content

EPA’s New Turbine Rules Provide Air Permitting Relief for Data Centers

May 14, 2026

On January 15, 2026, the EPA published New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for stationary combustion and gas turbines. The EPA also provided permitting relief and the potential for permit exemption in the future. For combustion turbines, the rule categorizes sources based upon size, utilization rates, design efficiency, and fuel type and requires combustion controls for NOX with additional selective catalytic reduction for large combustion turbines with high utilization rates. Sulfur dioxide controls did not change.

In addition to these controls, the EPA, citing its June 2012 memorandum on Title V permit exemptions for combustion turbines, exempted from the Title V major source permitting program those combustion turbines that are not major sources or are located at major sources. This exemption would apply to small, medium, and large, low-use subcategories. Permitting these sources would now fall to the States’ non-major permitting programs. Moreover, to further streamline permits for these sources, the EPA has suggested that States use general permits or permits by rule.

The EPA also added a subcategory that covers small- and medium-sized combustion turbines that are used in “temporary” applications. Data center use of turbines in temporary applications has drawn criticism lately, leading to filing suit against a data center for operation of unpermitted emission units.

The temporary designation applies to combustion turbines up to 850 MMBtu/hour used for less than 24 months. A temporary turbine cannot be replaced with another temporary turbine to circumvent the permitting requirement.

Of interest to data centers using temporary turbines to provide power, the EPA indicated that it believes that combustion turbines are “a kind of internal combustion engine “ that could be regulated as nonroad engines (i.e., mobile sources) under Title II of the Act. However, the current definition of “nonroad engine” does not include combustion turbines. The effect of this change is to exempt such turbines from the new source review permitting requirements of the Act because it will no longer be considered part of the stationary source.

In the final rule, the EPA includes a conditional exclusion for temporary turbines. The exclusion removes combustion turbines from the definition of “stationary combustion turbines” if the turbine meets the definition of nonroad engine and is certified to meet emission standards adopted under Title II of the Act. According to the EPA, this exclusion will become effective if the EPA adopts nonroad emission standards and certification requirements for portable combustion turbines. At that time, the manufacturer of combustion turbines will be subject to the Title II requirements for mobile sources, including obtaining certificates of conformity.

The EPA recognized that its approach requires further consideration before any rulemaking is initiated. However, it did not give any indication of when it may propose non-road engine emission standards and certification requirements under Title II.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author(s) only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC or Clark Hill Solicitors LLP. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

News

Clark Hill Adds Simone McCormick as a Member to San Francisco Office

Explore more
Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more