Skip to content

Public School Construction and Prevailing Wage

October 14, 2021

On June 6, 2018, the Michigan Legislature adopted Initiated Law 2 of 2018, which repealed Michigan Public Act 166 of 1965, commonly referred to as the Prevailing Wage Act. With the repeal of the Prevailing Wage Act, State-funded construction projects, which included many public school construction projects, no longer were required to ensure contractors and subcontractors on those projects were paid prevailing wages and fringe benefits.

Recently, Governor Whitmer announced on Oct. 7 the reinstatement of the prevailing wage requirements and indicated that the State of Michigan will require State contractors and subcontractors to pay prevailing wage for construction projects. This broad announcement caused concern for public school districts as many public school construction projects are funded with funds sponsored or financed, in whole or in part, by the State, including but not limited to, funds secured through bonds qualified by the State of Michigan. Under the former Prevailing Wage Act, these bond funds were deemed to be State-sponsored construction projects subject to the prevailing wage requirements.

Notwithstanding Governor Whitmer’s recent announcement regarding the reinstatement of prevailing wage requirements, Governor Whitmer has not issued an Executive Order or Executive Directive on prevailing wage, and no other legislative action has been taken to reinstate the former Prevailing Wage Act. Under the Management and Budget Act, therefore, these prevailing wage requirements are limited to internal administrative or procedural directives of the Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB), affecting only construction contracts let by the DTMB, unless or until an Executive Order or Executive Director is issued by the Governor.

Accordingly, public school construction projects that utilize State and/or local funds continue to be exempt from any prevailing wage requirements. However, public school districts should be aware that if Federal funds are used to fund school construction projects, those construction projects may be subject to the Federal prevailing wage requirements under the Federal Davis-Bacon Act.

If you have any questions about these or other issues in connection with school construction or the competitive bidding of current or future school construction projects, please contact Dana L. Abrahams at dabrahams@clarkhill.com | (248) 988-5840, Jeremy S. Motz at jmotz@clarkhill.com | (248) 988-5895, or another member of Clark Hill’s Education Law team.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Webinar: Special Education Bootcamp - Compliance Foundations Under IDEA

Whether you are new to special education leadership or looking to reinforce your foundational knowledge, this interactive webinar will provide a comprehensive overview of the core compliance requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Designed for school leaders who are responsible for ensuring legally sound practices, this session will offer practical tools and strategies to help participants navigate common procedural and substantive pitfalls, support sound decision-making, and build a compliant and student-centered special education program.

Explore more
Event

Telehealth Week Webinar 2025: Navigating Legal Changes and Future Trends for Healthcare Providers

Join Paul Schmeltzer, Carrie Foote, and John Howard for our one-hour annual Telehealth Week webinar, focused on the evolving legal landscape of telehealth. This session will cover key topics, including the upcoming DEA final rule on prescribing controlled substances via telehealth, federal reimbursement concerns for telehealth, and what healthcare providers need to prepare for other upcoming changes.

Explore more
Event

2025 Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Laws Summit

Join us for an immersive half-day seminar exploring the rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity, data privacy, and AI-related regulation. This year’s summit will feature dynamic discussions with industry leaders, offering practical insights into the tools, tactics, and legal implications shaping incident response and AI accountability in 2026 and beyond.

Explore more