Skip to content

Non-Renewal of Michigan Probationary Teacher Contracts

January 27, 2026

The deadlines are approaching for non-renewal of probationary teacher contracts. The standard probationary period is four years.

Under the Michigan Teachers’ Tenure Act, MCL 38.83, a board of education is required to provide a probationary teacher with a definite written statement as to whether his or her work has been effective. The statute provides that for a probationary teacher who is under the four-year period, a teacher will be employed for the ensuing year unless notified in writing at least 15 days before the end of the school year (June 30) whether his or her services will be discontinued. For illustrative purposes, for a teacher whose contract terminates on June 30, the statute requires that written notice be provided on or before June 15.

A district should be aware of some other requirements regarding probationary teachers. Beginning July 1, 2024, under MCL 38.83b(3), a teacher shall not be considered to have successfully completed the probationary period unless the teacher has been rated as effective (or highly effective before July 1, 2024) on three (3) of the teacher’s year-end performance evaluations, including the most recent year-end performance evaluation, under section 1249 of the revised school code, and has completed at least four (4) full school years of employment in a probationary period.

For teachers who have acquired tenure in another school district, the probationary period is still two (2) years beginning with the date of their first day of their employment, unless the board of education immediately places the teacher on continuing tenure. The Teachers’ Tenure Act requires that notice of non-renewal must be given at least 60 days before the completion of the probationary period.  MCL 38.92. For illustrative purposes, for teachers whose annual employment corresponds to the school year ending June 30, 2026, written notice is required on or before May 1, 2026.  For teachers who started mid-school year, the 60 days are calculated from the anniversary date of their first day of employment.

In addition, the Teachers’ Tenure Act requires a school district to provide a probationary teacher with an individualized development plan developed by the appropriate administrative personnel in consultation with the individual teacher. Under MCL 380.1249, first year probationary teachers are to receive a mid-year progress report, and the Teachers’ Tenure Act requires school districts to provide the teacher with an annual year-end performance evaluation that is based on classroom observations and that includes an assessment of the teacher’s progress in meeting the goals of his or her individual development plan.  MCL 38.83a.

If you have any questions regarding non-renewal of a probationary teacher contract, please contact a Clark Hill Education Law attorney.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author(s) only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC or Clark Hill Solicitors LLP. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more