Colorado SB 26-114: Colorado’s New Liquor Permit That Gives Spirits Manufacturers Distillery Pub-Style Functionality
Author
Michael J. Laszlo
The Colorado General Assembly adjourned on May 13, 2026, and Colorado Senate Bill 26-114 — passed by both chambers and now heading to the Governor — quietly reshapes what a licensed spirits manufacturer can do on its own licensed premises and at its approved sales room.
Under the new changes to C.R.S. § 44-3-402, Colorado distillers will be able to serve and sell beer, wine, other distillers’ spirits, and beers and wines by the drink for on-premises consumption at the distiller’s manufacturing facility and at the manufacturer’s approved sales room. In practical effect, the bill grafts much of the retail functionality of a Colorado Distillery Pub onto a manufacturer’s license, while letting the producer keep all the production and distribution rights a distillery pub does not have.
What Colorado’s New Distillery Law Authorizes
The new permit, created by new subsections (7)(a)(I)(B) and (7)(a)(I)(C) of C.R.S. § 44-3-402, authorizes a manufacturer of spirituous liquors to serve and sell — at retail, by the drink — any alcohol beverages it has acquired from a Colorado-licensed wholesaler. That includes beer, wine (including vermouths and other vinous modifiers), other distillers’ spirits, and liqueurs. The authority extends to the manufacturer’s main licensed premises and to its one approved sales room.
The new permit is two-step. A spirits manufacturer first applies to the local licensing authority.[1] That application runs through the standard retail-license procedural machinery: §§ 44-3-301(2)(a), 44-3-311, 44-3-312, and 44-3-313 — meaning notice requirements, 45-day posting at the proposed location, newspaper publication, and neighborhood needs and desires analysis that a retail license applicant would face. Once the local authority issues the permit, the manufacturer then applies to the state licensing authority for the companion permit. A separate permit is required for each location, and each permit runs for one year.
The permit, once issued, comes with several operational guardrails:
- On-premises consumption only for wholesaler-acquired product. Beverages acquired from a wholesaler under the permit cannot be sold for off-premises consumption, takeout, or delivery under § 44-3-911(4)(c)(V). The manufacturer’s existing right under § 44-3-402 to sell its own spirits in sealed containers for off-premises consumption is preserved — the new restriction applies only to other producers’ products.
- Food available. Sandwiches and light snacks must be available; full meals are not required.
- A 50% revenue cap. Proceeds from the sale of wholesaler-acquired alcohol cannot exceed 50% of the manufacturer’s gross annual revenue from alcohol beverage sales. The manufacturer’s own production must continue to drive at least half of beverage sales revenue.
Section 2 adds local fees in § 44-3-505: a $500 annual fee paid to the local treasurer for the state-issued permit, up to $1,000 for the local application, and up to $100 for renewal (with an expired-renewal cap of $500). New § 44-3-402(7)(d) authorizes the state licensing authority to adopt implementing rules.
Distillery Pub Functionality, Without the License
The bill’s most interesting structural effect is to give a manufacturer many of the retail features the distillery pub statute (§ 44-3-426) had walled off as a separate license tier — without subjecting the manufacturer to that tier’s structural constraints. A distillery pub is capped at 875,000 liters of annual production, must derive at least 15% of its gross on-premises food and beverage income from food, and is sharply limited in its ability to distribute its own product wholesale (2,700 liters per product per year). A permitted § 44-3-402 manufacturer is subject to none of those constraints — it keeps its uncapped production and unrestricted distribution rights while gaining the ability to operate the front-of-house in a way that closely resembles a distillery pub bar.
The principal constraint running the other direction is the 50% revenue cap on wholesaler-acquired alcohol — a constraint a distillery pub does not face — which keeps the manufacturer’s identity tethered to its own production. On the off-premises front, the manufacturer and the distillery pub end up in essentially the same place: each can sell its own spirits in sealed containers to go, but neither can sell wholesaler-acquired beer, wine, or other distillers’ spirits for off-premises consumption.
Should a Distillery Pub “Convert”?
A natural question, given the structural overlap, is whether an existing distillery pub licensee should migrate to a manufacturer’s license plus the new permit. The short answer: This is not a true conversion — it is a re-licensure — and the calculus is very operator-specific.
There is no statutory bridge between § 44-3-426 and § 44-3-402. A distillery pub seeking to migrate would need to apply to the state for a manufacturer’s license under § 44-3-402, apply locally and then to the state for the new wholesaler-beverage permits under § 44-3-402(7)(a)(I)(B) and (C), and surrender or let lapse the existing distillery pub license. Each step carries its own application work, fees, and timelines.
More fundamentally, however, is that this is not just a change in license type: It is a change in tier under Colorado’s three-tier system, and that warrants careful diligence before anything else. A distillery pub is statutorily defined as a retail establishment (§ 44-3-103(14)(a)); a § 44-3-402 manufacturer sits on the production side. Colorado’s tied-house provisions of § 44-3-308 prohibit a manufacturer from holding retail or wholesaler interests, and the constellation of cross-tier relationships that a distillery pub owner may have permissibly built up at the retail tier will not necessarily survive in their existing form on the production tier. Interests in other retail licenses, financial or branding relationships with retailers, certain wholesaler arrangements, and even shared-ownership structures with retail-side partners should all be assessed — and, where necessary, unwound or restructured — at the front end of any conversion. This is a threshold question, not a paperwork item.
The strategic case for migrating is strongest for distillery pubs that have outgrown the 875,000-liter annual production cap, are constrained by the 2,700-liter-per-product cap on wholesale sales to retailers, or whose food sales are at risk of slipping below the statutory 15% floor. The manufacturer side is uncapped on production and unrestricted on wholesale distribution, and the new permit’s food requirement is satisfied by keeping sandwiches and light snacks on hand.
The case against is strongest for distillery pubs whose business identity is built around the pub itself — meaningful food traffic, beer and wine sales that draw non-distillery customers, and location in retail-zoned premises that may not survive review as a manufacturing facility. Zoning is often the threshold variable: Many distillery pubs operate in commercial or mixed-use districts where a § 44-3-402 manufacturer’s use would require a different zoning classification or conditional-use review. The 50% wholesaler-revenue cap is also a meaningful constraint on operations whose alcohol revenue is currently driven more by guest pours than by in-house production.
What This Means for Colorado Distillers
For a distillery whose tasting room has historically been a low-margin complement to its distribution business, the new permit may meaningfully change the economics of the front of house. Pairing a flight of in-house whiskey with a guest beer or a glass of wine becomes possible for the first time. The 50% cap ensures the manufacturer’s own product remains the primary revenue driver, which is consistent with the long-standing policy reason for keeping § 44-3-402 distinct from retail licenses.
The local approval requirement is the variable to watch. Because the permit runs through the same § 44-3-301(2)(a) needs and desires of the neighborhood machinery applied to retail licenses, distillers in more restrictive jurisdictions should expect a meaningful procedural lift and would do well to start the conversation with their local licensing authority before filing.
Timeline and Next Steps
Subject to the Governor’s signature and the 90-day referendum window, SB 26-114 takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on August 12, 2026. The state licensing authority is expressly authorized to adopt implementing rules, so industry stakeholders should watch for rulemaking from the Liquor Enforcement Division in the second half of 2026.
[1] The bill summary printed at the top of the rerevised version of SB 26-114 still reflects the bill as introduced, which described a single state-issued permit with the local authority providing only comment. The Senate’s April 28, 2026 amendments rewrote the operative provisions to create the two-step, local-then-state framework discussed here, and the introduced-version summary is no longer accurate.
This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author(s) only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC or Clark Hill Solicitors LLP. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.