Skip to content

Department of Defense opens comment period on major changes to defense contracting for small businesses

July 17, 2025

On July 9, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) provided notice of a 30-day comment period for proposed regulations designed to modernize its acquisition process. This is a critical window for small businesses to directly influence the future of defense procurement and improve access to federal contracts. The request for comment is tied to Executive Order 14265, “Modernizing Defense Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base.” This is a significant opportunity for small businesses to directly influence the future of defense procurement and potentially secure greater access to federal contracting opportunities.

What’s Driving This Reform?

The executive order focuses on fundamental changes to how the DoD acquires goods and services, with particular emphasis on accelerating the procurement of advanced technologies and revitalizing the defense industrial base. DoD is seeking to reverse the troubling decline in small business participation in defense contracting by reducing barriers to entry and increasing competition. This proposed reform effort encompasses four key areas where input from small businesses could directly impact future procurement policies:

  1. Acquisition Process Reform: The DoD wants to accelerate the purchase of advanced technology and streamline decision-making.
    • SB Opportunity: Sharing experiences with procurement challenges to help create more efficient pathways to contract awards.
  1. Regulations Review: The comment period provides small businesses the opportunity to identify current DoD regulations that create unnecessary barriers or complicate the ability of small contractors to work with the government.
    • SB Opportunity: Recommend specific regulatory changes that would improve contracting efficiency and small business relationships with the DoD.
  1. Acquisition Workforce Reform: The DoD plans to restructure and retrain its acquisition workforce to better incentivize innovation and risk-taking.
    • SB Opportunity: Sharing real-world insights on how acquisition personnel currently interact with small businesses can influence future training and evaluation.
  1. Requirements Streamlining: The DoD is reviewing its process for developing and communicating project requirements to industry (the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, or JCIDS).
    • SB Opportunity: Suggest ways to improve how future contract requirements are developed and communicated to potential contractors to encourage more small business participation.

Why This Matters to Small Businesses

Regulatory comment periods represent tangible and actionable opportunities for impacted players to influence policy at the highest levels. The DoD is specifically interested in hearing from small businesses currently in or interested in joining the defense industrial base. These comments could:

  • Shape new procurement processes that are more accessible to small businesses
  • Eliminate regulatory barriers that currently prevent small business participation
  • Influence how acquisition personnel are trained to work with small business contractors
  • Impact how future contract requirements are developed and communicated

Next Steps

This executive order reflects the administration’s stated commitment to defense acquisition reform and small business participation. We recommend that eligible small businesses submit thoughtful, specific comments that address day-to-day pain points and challenges that your companies face and propose practical solutions. The DoD’s explicit focus on small business participation suggests that well-crafted comments could have a significant influence on final policy decisions.

The 30-day comment period ends on Aug. 7, and the potential impact on future small business opportunities in defense contracting makes this effort worthwhile. For assistance in preparing your comments or understanding the implications of the proposed regulations, please don’t hesitate to reach out to Clark Hill’s experienced Government Contracts team.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Using “Schedule A” Litigation to Combat Online Trademark Infringement

In today’s digital world, trademark infringement is a significant concern for businesses aiming to protect their brand identity. Accordingly, it is important for businesses to implement a multifaceted online enforcement strategy to protect their intellectual property rights. Among the various legal avenues available to combat counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks, “Schedule A” lawsuits, which are most often filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, have emerged as a powerful tool. As intellectual property attorneys at Clark Hill, we regularly help businesses secure and enforce their IP rights. Here, we will explore what Schedule A trademark infringement litigation entails, how it works, and why it’s essential for companies to understand this avenue for enforcing their legal rights.

Explore more