Skip to content

Clark Hill Helps Automotive Supplier Avoid Costly Tariffs

November 5, 2024

Kelsey Christensen, Mark Ludwikowski, and Sally Alghazali successfully represented automotive supplier MAHLE before the U.S. International Trade Commission.

As a result, MAHLE’s importing of aluminum extrusions from 14 countries to be used in automotive parts will not face tariffs in excess of 300% upon shipment to the U.S., resulting in millions of dollars in savings.

“This would have impacted many of MAHLE’s imports for sale to its OEM customers, so we’re thrilled to get such a significant victory,” Christensen said.

MAHLE purchases aluminum extrusions and manufactures them into automotive parts for OEMs in the U.S. and globally. Many of its automotive part imports contain aluminum extrusions that could have become subject to additional tariffs.

Clark Hill’s trio of international trade attorneys represented MAHLE from the outset of the case about a year ago. Before the USITC, they successfully argued that MAHLE’s imports are not hurting US companies.

“One of the points we argued is that these imports are not aluminum extrusions but auto parts instead. They’re not competing for sale in the United States with the aluminum pieces. They’re competing for sales against other auto part producers,” Christensen said.

MAHLE’s victory represents a rare win for a respondent before the USITC. Over the past five years, petitioners have succeeded in having 86% of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations result in orders.

“This was a tremendous group effort to argue MAHLE’s case before the USITC and the Department of Commerce,” Ludwikowski said. “The scope of this case was broader than most, but our experience of arguing before both agencies helped us prove MAHLE’s position.”

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Webinar- Dark Patterns in Healthcare: Navigating Patient Consent, Website Privacy, and Emerging Regulatory Risk 

Healthcare organizations increasingly rely on digital tools to engage patients, streamline intake, and improve care coordination. At the same time, regulators are closely scrutinizing whether online interfaces, consent mechanisms, and patient-facing technologies improperly influence or manipulate patient choices through so-called “dark patterns.”

Explore more
Legal Updates

Texas’ Hemp THC Crackdown is Now in Effect: What Businesses Need to Know

As of Jul. 31st, Texas is enforcing tough new restrictions on hemp-derived THC products, and it’s changing the game for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers across the state. This isn’t one new law; it’s the Texas Department of State Health Services’ (DSHS) messy revival of dormant 2021 rules after a Texas Supreme Court ruling, on top of separate consumable-hemp regulations that kicked in earlier this year and are still being fought over in court. Bottom line: the rules have shifted more than once in 2026, and businesses need a clear picture of what’s banned, what’s still fine, and what’s still up in the air.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Nasdaq's $5 Million MVLS Rule Approved: What Issuers Need to Know About the Final Rule and the SEC’s Temporary Stay of Effectiveness

The SEC has approved Nasdaq’s new $5 million Market Value of Listed Securities (MVLS) continued listing standard, while temporarily staying its effectiveness pending potential Commission review. Although the final rule retains Nasdaq’s accelerated delisting framework, it expands the Nasdaq Hearings Panel’s authority to grant limited relief, giving certain issuers additional time to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s more stringent initial listing standards.

Explore more