Skip to content

What Debt Settlement Companies Need to Know When Working With Third Party Payment Processors (Whitepaper)

January 27, 2025

Clark Hill’s Financial Services and Regulatory Compliance Group has authored a whitepaper for debt settlement companies considering engaging a third-party payment processor for managing accounts and handling financial transactions. This whitepaper outlines and provides insight into the requirements governing oversight over third party payment processors; explores the various laws and regulations that are integral for a DSC when developing a robust and well-executed third party risk management program with its payment processing partner; provides an overview of federal and state enforcement actions when those laws and regulations are not followed by either a DSC or a payment processor; and finally, outlines key contractual provisions taken directly from the Interagency Guidance that should be considered by a DSC when entering into a business relationship with a payment processor.

What Debt Settlement Companies Need to Know When Working With Third Party Payment Processors

 

This whitepaper is authored by Clark Hill’s Financial Services and Regulatory Compliance Group. The paper provides an objective legal and regulatory overview of the payment processing landscape in order for debt settlement companies to make informed decisions about the partners they choose to work with. RAM Payment, LLC (“Reliant”) commissioned Clark Hill to write the whitepaper as a resource for industry participants. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this whitepaper are not endorsed or approved by Reliant and are solely the opinions and conclusions of Clark Hill based upon the law and regulations cited herein. This whitepaper does not take into account the factual circumstances of any individual or entity and should not be relied upon as legal advice for any matter. This whitepaper does not establish an attorney client relationship between Clark Hill PLC and any individual or entity. If you have a legal issue that relates to the topics of this whitepaper, you should contact an attorney for assistance in your matter.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more