SBA Provides Updated Guidance for the Continued Administration of the 8(a) Program
As stated in our prior legal alert, on July 19, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee enjoined the U.S. Small Business Administration from using a rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage in administering the SBA’s 8(a) BD program. In response, the SBA temporarily suspended new 8(a) application submissions to comply with the Court’s order. On Aug. 18, the SBA released official guidance on next steps for current 8(a) participants and new applicants to the program. As the government approaches the end of its fiscal year, typically a busy time for contract awards, the SBA also specifically directed federal agencies to continue use of the program, a clear indication of the impact of the Court’s ruling.
The 8(a) BD government contracting program provides certain benefits to socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. Prior to the Court’s injunction, individuals belonging to certain identified groups were presumed to be socially disadvantaged. The Court found this presumption to be contrary to the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As of the publication of this legal update, the SBA has yet to appeal the Court’s order, although an appeal may follow a hearing in the case currently scheduled for Aug. 31.
The SBA is now immediately ceasing use of the social disadvantage presumption and will be requiring all new 8(a) Participant applicants to certify to their social disadvantage by submitting to the SBA a written narrative and supporting documentation. Current 8(a) Participants whose program eligibility was based upon the presumption will now be required to submit a written narrative to establish their individual social disadvantage. These Participants should receive a communication from the SBA with details on making this submission. Current Participants admitted into the 8(a) BD program based on the qualifying owner establishing social disadvantage will not be required to submit a new narrative to remain in the program. Because entity-owned businesses (e.g., Native Hawaiian Organizations and Alaskan Native Organizations) are not required by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and SBA regulations to prove social disadvantage to be admitted into the 8(a) program, such entities will remain exempt from this narrative requirement.
The SBA states that its currently developing a new narrative process but until then the SBA will use its existing narrative process. Under this process, properly drafted socially disadvantage narratives should discuss two elements: (1) an indication of which identity or identities is/are the basis of social disadvantage; and (2) descriptions of incidents in which bias or discrimination has occurred. The narrative must describe applicant’s “race, religion, ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, identifiable disability, [or] isolation from American society.” Also, narratives “should typically provide two incidents of bias to establish chronic and substantial social disadvantage.” Each experience should be related to education, employment, and business history, and should provide details of the who, what, where, why, when, and how discrimination or bias occurred. Applicants and current Participants should review the SBA guidance and/or consult counsel when preparing their narratives to avoid any adverse findings by the SBA.
This current guidance from the SBA should only be considered temporary and a stopgap measure to address much of the initial confusion as to the status of the 8(a) program stemming from the Court’s injunction. Additional guidance should be expected. Absent relief from the Sixth Circuit, the SBA will likely initiate a new rule making process to permanently modify current 8(a) BD program regulations.
Clark Hill’s Government Contracting and Regulatory team will continue to monitor this evolving situation. Clark Hill’s team stands ready to assist 8(a) Participants and applicants as needed. If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Bret Wacker (firstname.lastname@example.org 202.772.0906) or Chris White (email@example.com 202.772.0903).
This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.
WEBINAR: The Race to 2024: Politics and Social Media in the Workplace and Employer Rights.
Over the last several years, employers have seen and continue to see increased political activities from their employees at work and on social media platforms, including on business-related social media platforms, like LinkedIn. Managing employee expression causes unique challenges for employers and HR professionals, and in a General Election year, these challenges are likely to increase as the Presidential race, and other races, heat up.
WEBINAR: Cybersecurity Resilience in Law Firms
This webinar focuses on law firms seeking useful information about robust cybersecurity strategies to protect their clients, maintain ethical and legal compliance, and fortify their digital infrastructure.
WEBINAR: Using Equity/Ownership Incentives to Retain Key Employees
This webinar will provide an overview of how to evaluate and implement strategies to retain your key employees and executives using equity based incentives.