Skip to content

Public School Construction and Prevailing Wage

October 14, 2021

On June 6, 2018, the Michigan Legislature adopted Initiated Law 2 of 2018, which repealed Michigan Public Act 166 of 1965, commonly referred to as the Prevailing Wage Act. With the repeal of the Prevailing Wage Act, State-funded construction projects, which included many public school construction projects, no longer were required to ensure contractors and subcontractors on those projects were paid prevailing wages and fringe benefits.

Recently, Governor Whitmer announced on Oct. 7 the reinstatement of the prevailing wage requirements and indicated that the State of Michigan will require State contractors and subcontractors to pay prevailing wage for construction projects. This broad announcement caused concern for public school districts as many public school construction projects are funded with funds sponsored or financed, in whole or in part, by the State, including but not limited to, funds secured through bonds qualified by the State of Michigan. Under the former Prevailing Wage Act, these bond funds were deemed to be State-sponsored construction projects subject to the prevailing wage requirements.

Notwithstanding Governor Whitmer’s recent announcement regarding the reinstatement of prevailing wage requirements, Governor Whitmer has not issued an Executive Order or Executive Directive on prevailing wage, and no other legislative action has been taken to reinstate the former Prevailing Wage Act. Under the Management and Budget Act, therefore, these prevailing wage requirements are limited to internal administrative or procedural directives of the Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB), affecting only construction contracts let by the DTMB, unless or until an Executive Order or Executive Director is issued by the Governor.

Accordingly, public school construction projects that utilize State and/or local funds continue to be exempt from any prevailing wage requirements. However, public school districts should be aware that if Federal funds are used to fund school construction projects, those construction projects may be subject to the Federal prevailing wage requirements under the Federal Davis-Bacon Act.

If you have any questions about these or other issues in connection with school construction or the competitive bidding of current or future school construction projects, please contact Dana L. Abrahams at dabrahams@clarkhill.com | (248) 988-5840, Jeremy S. Motz at jmotz@clarkhill.com | (248) 988-5895, or another member of Clark Hill’s Education Law team.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more