Skip to content

Non-Renewal of Michigan Probationary Teacher Contracts

January 24, 2023

The deadlines are approaching for non-renewal of probationary teacher contracts.  The standard probationary period is five years.

Under the Michigan Teachers’ Tenure Act, MCL 38.83, a board of education is required to provide a probationary teacher with a definite written statement as to whether his or her work has been effective. The statute provides that for a probationary teacher who is under the five-year period, a teacher will be employed for the ensuing year unless notified in writing at least 15 days before the end of the school year—June 30—whether his or her services will be discontinued. For illustrative purposes, for a teacher whose contract terminates on June 30, the statute requires that written notice be provided on or before Thursday, June 15, 2023.

A district should be aware of some other requirements regarding probationary teachers. Under MCL 38.83b, a teacher shall not be considered to have successfully completed the probationary period unless the teacher has been rated effective or highly effective on his or her three most recent annual year-end performance evaluations, that are in compliance with section 1249 of the Michigan Revised School Code, MCL 380.1249, and has completed at least five full school years of employment in a probationary period. Also, the statute provides that a probationary teacher who is rated highly effective on three consecutive annual year-end evaluations and who has completed at least four full school years of employment shall be considered to have successfully completed the probationary period.

For teachers who have acquired tenure in another school district, the probationary period is still two years beginning with the date of their first day of their employment.  The Teachers’ Tenure Act requires that notice of non-renewal must be given at least 60 days before the completion of the probationary period. MCL 38.92. For illustrative purposes, for teachers whose annual employment corresponds to the school year ending June 30, 2023, written notice is required on or before Monday, May 1, 2023. For teachers who started mid-school year, the 60 days is calculated from the anniversary date of their first day of employment.

In addition, the Teachers’ Tenure Act requires a school district to provide a probationary teacher with an individualized development plan developed by the appropriate administrative personnel in consultation with the individual teacher. Under MCL 380.1249, first-year probationary teachers are to receive a midyear progress report, and the Teachers’ Tenure Act requires school districts to provide the teacher with an annual year-end performance evaluation that is based on classroom observations that include an assessment of the teacher’s progress in meeting the goals of his or her individual development plan. MCL 38.83a.

If you have any questions regarding non-renewal of a probationary teacher contract, please contact your Clark Hill PLC education law attorney.

The views and opinions expressed in the article represent the view of the authors and not necessarily the official view of Clark Hill PLC. Nothing in this article constitutes professional legal advice nor is it intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more