Skip to content

Elizabeth Evans and Dean Olson obtain jury defense verdict

July 30, 2025

Los Angeles attorneys Elizabeth Evans and Dean Olson obtained a jury defense verdict in Salazar v. Jobs on the Road on July 28.

The plaintiff sought $5 million for brain damage and severe orthopedic injuries following a fall from a semi-tractor owned by Evans and Olson’s client.

While the plaintiff presented credible past and future treatment plans and testimony from a neurologist, neuropsychologist, neurosurgeon, and orthopedic surgeon, Evans and Olson turned the case on the question of whether the plaintiff should have observed the dangerous condition of the semi-tractor.

“We retained a national team of highly credible liability and damage experts who provided excellent analysis and trial testimony,” Evans said. “Given the facts in this case, it was difficult to deflect the negligence claims, but we were able to prove that negligence was not a substantial factor in the cause of the injuries.”

The Los Angeles Superior Court jury agreed with Evans and Olson’s claims by returning a verdict that their client was negligent and presented a dangerous condition, but that the plaintiff should have observed the condition and avoided the fall that caused her injuries.

“This is a great outcome for the client despite challenging circumstances,” Olson said. “Elizabeth did a tremendous job with trial preparation and expert questioning, and we’re thrilled to deliver this result.”

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

Intellectual Property Rights and Instruments of Service

Frequently on construction projects, design professionals such as architects and engineers are retained to invest substantial professional skill, time, and resources in creating drawings, specifications, calculations, models, and other documents. These materials are commonly known as “instruments of service” and are often mischaracterized as simple deliverables. However,  instruments of service embody design decisions, technical knowledge, original expression, and, increasingly, complex digital information.  

Explore more
Legal Updates

The FTC Personalized Pricing Inquiry Turn Toward Compensation

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expanded its focus on personalized pricing beyond consumer transactions and into worker compensation. Through a new inquiry targeting major airlines, ride-share companies, and food-delivery platforms, the FTC is examining how companies use personal data, algorithms, and other technologies to determine both consumer pricing and gig-worker pay. This development signals a significant shift in regulatory scrutiny and raises important compliance considerations for businesses navigating a growing patchwork of state and local personalized pricing laws.

Explore more
Legal Updates

New Trade Petitions Target Certain Shopping Carts and Parts Thereof from China, Alleging Dumping Margins of Up to 343%

On October 28, 2026, U.S. producers filed antidumping and countervailing duty petitions on certain shopping carts and parts thereof from China with the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission. The petitions allege dumping margins ranging from 165% to 343% and subsidies above the de minimis level.

Explore more