Modernizing How Medicare Pays Physicians

Healthcare has changed. CMS is working to modernize Medicare physician payment.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued its proposed 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. CMS recognizes that healthcare delivery has evolved while Medicare’s physician payment system relies on methodologies developed for a past practice environment. CMS proposes reforms that will modernize physician payment so Medicare reflects how care is delivered today.

Healthcare organizations confront many of the same challenges. Physician practices face rising labor costs, increasing technology costs, cybersecurity demands, workforce shortages, and growing administrative complexity while operating under outdated payment models. CMS wants to improve payment accuracy, encourage clinically meaningful innovation, and protect Medicare resources. Both providers and regulators recognize that the physician payment system has become disconnected from modern healthcare delivery. CMS proposes a modernization of physician payment through emerging technologies, updating physician practice cost measurements, and aligning Medicare payment with how physicians deliver care today.

Why This Matters

Healthcare executives make long-term decisions regarding physician recruitment, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, capital expenditures, mergers and acquisitions, and organizational growth before future Medicare payment policies affect those investments. Medicare payment influences commercial reimbursement and CMS’s proposals affect private insurers as well.

The proposed rule provides insight into CMS’s thinking on physician payment for the coming years. Organizations that evaluate these proposals before the regulations become final are better positioned to incorporate payment changes into strategic planning, technology investments, physician compensation, and long-term financial decision-making.

Artificial Intelligence and Technology-Enabled Care

Healthcare organizations invest heavily in artificial intelligence, ambient documentation, predictive analytics, and other technology-enabled tools to improve diagnostic accuracy, increase efficiency, and address workforce shortages. These investments require substantial capital, yet Medicare payment uncertainty makes it difficult to evaluate long-term financial returns and determine which technologies warrant continued investment.

CMS recognizes that artificial intelligence is an important component of clinical care but believes Medicare payment should be tied to technologies that demonstrate measurable clinical value within an appropriate regulatory framework. Through a new payment approach under the Physician Fee Schedule, CMS’s proposal recognizes certain FDA-authorized AI-enabled software used in physicians’ clinical decision-making. CMS proposes policies to improve physicians’ access to existing clinical information and to reduce unnecessary duplicate diagnostic testing, all in an effort to improve interoperability and care coordination. Together, these proposals encourage responsible innovation, strengthen payment integrity, and reduce unnecessary Medicare spending. Healthcare organizations should consider whether future technology investments, vendor selection, payment assumptions, and digital health strategies remain consistent with the direction of Medicare payment policy.

Modernizing How Medicare Pays Physicians

Healthcare organizations question whether Medicare payments accurately reflect the cost of delivering modern healthcare. Labor expenses, employee benefits, electronic health records, cybersecurity, compliance programs, technology investments, and administrative costs have grown substantially, while portions of Medicare’s Practice Expense methodology continue to rely on assumptions developed years ago.

In the proposed rule, CMS explains that its current Practice Expense methodology relies on outdated physician practice survey information and no longer accurately reflects the costs of operating physician practices. CMS proposes more objective, routinely updated, and auditable cost data that it believes will improve payment accuracy, increase transparency, and better align payment with the resources physicians actually use to furnish care.

Because Practice Expense is incorporated into payment for thousands of physician services, the proposal extends far beyond a technical reimbursement adjustment. Changes to the methodology could influence physician compensation, service-line profitability, budgeting, capital investment decisions, merger and acquisition valuations, and long-term financial planning. Healthcare organizations should assess how revisions to Practice Expense payments could affect their financial models before the methodology becomes final.

Strategic Considerations for Healthcare Organizations

The proposed rule reflects CMS’s effort to modernize physician payment in response to operational, financial, and technological pressures affecting healthcare organizations today. Although healthcare organizations and CMS often approach these issues from different perspectives, both recognize that the physician payment system must evolve alongside changes in healthcare delivery.

Decisions involving physician compensation, technology investments, digital transformation, service-line growth, capital planning, and organizational strategy depend on anticipating payment trends rather than reacting after regulations take effect. Organizations that begin evaluating these proposals now will be better positioned to identify risks, capitalize on opportunities, and adapt as Medicare physician payment continues to evolve.

Key Takeaway

In its proposed 2027 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS does more than adjust annual payment rates. The agency attempts to modernize physician payment, so Medicare reflects today’s healthcare environment while balancing innovation, payment accuracy, fiscal stewardship, and program integrity.

Understanding CMS’s rationale behind these changes may prove more valuable for future planning. Every organization will be affected differently depending on its specialty, payer mix, technology investments, operational structure, contractual relationships, and business strategy.

Organizations will require an analysis of their payment structure, business objectives, technology investments, operational model, and regulatory risk profile.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author(s) only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC or Clark Hill Solicitors LLP. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.