Skip to content

“Clean Wine” Could be Misleading Says TTB

April 11, 2022

*Originally published by LaszloLaw

On April 8, 2022, the Tobacco Trade and Tax Bureau (“TTB”) issued a TTB Bulletin regarding the use of “Clean” labeling on alcohol beverages. It is a short, but pointed Bulletin, striking directly at the recent (and growing) trend of alcohol producers labeling their products as “clean.”

“Clean Wine” has become the term de jure and has been made popular by wines like Cameron Diaz’s “Avaline.” Not limited to wine, “clean” is used with spirits: “Clean Vodka” and other products.  However, the term “clean” can be misleading says the TTB: “consumers should not interpret the term [“clean”] as meaning that the beverage is organic or has met other production standards set by TTB.”

TTB went on to provide a few clarifications:

In some cases, the term “clean” is simply being used as a descriptor of the taste of the beverage, and is considered puffery. For example, “X winery makes a clean, crisp wine.

In other cases, the term is used together with other language to create the misleading impression that consumption of the alcohol beverage will have health benefits, or that the health risks otherwise associated with alcohol consumption will be mitigated. For example, ‘X malt beverage is clean and healthy’ or ‘Y vodka’s clean production methods mean no headaches for you.’”

Regarding these types of statements, the TTB was clear: “We would consider those claims to be misleading health-related statements.”

The TTB Clean Wine Bulletin is not a legal opinion, or enforcement standard, however, it is a pretty clear message to the industry to take caution in making unsubstantial claims. Also, look for Plaintiff’s lawyers to use this Bulletin against alcohol manufactures using the term “clean” in advertising in lawsuits for misrepresentation and false advertising. If you’re using the term “clean” on your bottle, or in advertising, take caution, re-evaluate that use, and, of course, call your insurance broker to make sure you have adequate coverages.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Using “Schedule A” Litigation to Combat Online Trademark Infringement

In today’s digital world, trademark infringement is a significant concern for businesses aiming to protect their brand identity. Accordingly, it is important for businesses to implement a multifaceted online enforcement strategy to protect their intellectual property rights. Among the various legal avenues available to combat counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks, “Schedule A” lawsuits, which are most often filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, have emerged as a powerful tool. As intellectual property attorneys at Clark Hill, we regularly help businesses secure and enforce their IP rights. Here, we will explore what Schedule A trademark infringement litigation entails, how it works, and why it’s essential for companies to understand this avenue for enforcing their legal rights.

Explore more