Skip to content

Clark Hill’s Linda Watson Named Firm’s Inaugural Chief Growth Officer

January 14, 2026

Clark Hill today announced that longtime Executive Committee member and litigation practice leader Linda Watson has moved into the newly created Chief Growth Officer position, effective January 1, 2026. Watson is specifically tasked with charting a strategic path for sustainable revenue and profitability growth, attraction and retention of outstanding professional talent, and advisement for technological enhancements.

“Clark Hill has experienced substantial growth in revenue, headcount, and geographic footprint over the past several years. The development of the firm’s Chief Growth Officer role is a natural progression to sustain our financial stability and continue to grow efficiently,” said John Hensien, Clark Hill CEO. “Linda has an outstanding reputation inside and outside the firm, together with proven ability to effectuate change, having successfully led multiple key firm initiatives. She is a strong mentor, an outstanding leader, and a respected partner who also brings her deep institutional knowledge to the new Chief Growth Officer role.”

“Operationally, this really is a collaborative role that touches on every aspect of the firm. I look forward to using my institutional knowledge of Clark Hill, and the skill sets I’ve developed as a leader and strategic advisor, to make a material impact on the future of the firm as the CGO.” Watson said.

The Chief Growth Officer position has grown in popularity at law firms as the competitive market changes. The convergence of industry consolidation, increased sophistication of in-house legal departments and the rise of alternative legal service providers motivated Clark Hill to identify a leader to work hand-in-glove with the firm’s Chief Executive Officer, John Hensien, to identify potential revenue channels, create operational efficiencies and strengthen talent retention and training practices.

Watson, who joined Clark Hill in 2007, previously co-led the firm’s Litigation Business Unit. She will continue to lead the firm’s Automotive and Manufacturing industry group. Watson also served multiple terms on the firm’s Executive Committee.

As a practicing litigator, Watson amassed numerous honors and recognitions. She has been named a “Top” and “Notable” lawyer by leading Michigan area publications for multiple years. She attended Stanford University’s Innovation and Entrepreneurship Certificate Program sponsored by the School of Engineering and she is a graduate of the Northwestern University Leading Diversity Equity and Inclusion Certification Program, earning her certification to lead DEI in 2020.

In addition, Linda is a graduate of the National Trial Institute for Trial Advocacy, one of the leading institutions for intensive professional training in the art and skills of trial advocacy. Watson earned her undergraduate degree at Oakland University and her Juris Doctor at Michigan State University College of Law.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

Mexican Ministry Of Finance Issues General Guidelines Aimed At Promoting Investment and Tax Compliance

Note: On May 4, 2026, the “General criteria and operational guidelines of an advisory nature to promote investment and tax compliance” (the “Guidelines”) was published in the Federal Register.

The purpose of the Guidelines is to direct administrative action in tax matters, strengthening legal certainty, efficiency, and trust in the relationship between the tax authority and taxpayers, as well as to promote investment, administrative simplification and voluntary compliance.

Explore more
Legal Updates

CIT Strikes Down Section 122 Tariffs: Big Holding, Narrow Relief, and a Refund Map for Importers

On May 7, 2026, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) held that President Trump exceeded the statutory authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 when he imposed the Administration’s temporary 10 percent “balance‑of‑payments” tariffs earlier this year.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Can an Employee Resist Submitting Their Claim into Arbitration by Using Another Employee’s Unfavorable Arbitration Outcome? The Ninth Circuit Held – No.

In O’Dell v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc., the Ninth Circuit addressed whether plaintiffs can use a procedural mechanism, non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel, to avoid enforcement of arbitration agreements—and held they cannot. The decision carries significant implications for employers facing multi-plaintiff claims.

Explore more

The Clark Hill approach is equally pragmatic and growth-minded, which is why we understand our clients’ toughest business challenges. Our multidisciplinary, global team of advisors focuses on smart legal solutions, delivered simply.

© 2026 Clark Hill PLC.