Skip to content

CHPS Podcast Episode 2: Bitcoin in the Halls of Power

April 23, 2025

In the second installment of CHPS of Insight, host Chris White and Bryan Jacoutot, Senior Director at Clark Hill Economics, delve into the complex yet intriguing world of cryptocurrency and blockchain policy. They explore the federal and state-level initiatives surrounding Bitcoin, touching on recent legislative moves, executive orders, and the broader implications for industry and governance.

Introduction to Cryptocurrency Policies

As the realm of digital currencies expands, so does the need for legislative clarity and visionary policy frameworks. Bryan explicates the efforts undertaken by the current administration to understand and regulate Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The Trump administration, in particular, has displayed a shift in attitude with an executive order on digital assets, positioning the United States as a potential leader in the cryptocurrency banking space. 

Federal Movements Toward Cryptocurrency Inclusion

Bryan and Chris highlight key federal initiatives, such as the proposed Bitcoin Act, which aims to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve akin to gold holdings. This proposal indicates a significant change in how federal institutions view digital assets, recognizing their potential as an investment vehicle for national reserves. Such initiatives intend not only to diversify but also to future-proof the country’s strategic asset holdings against the backdrop of technological adoption.

Navigating the Controversy of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the stark contrast between Bitcoin and Central Bank Digital Currencies. While Bitcoin provides users with autonomy and peer-to-peer transaction capabilities, CBDCs introduce a direct consumer-central bank relationship that raises concerns over privacy and economic control. Bryan explains how the administration’s opposition to CBDCs resonates with core American values of economic freedom and personal autonomy. 

State-Level Innovations and Strategies

The discussion shifts to the role of state governments as incubators for cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks. Bryan shares insights into how states like Georgia and Texas are pioneering strategic Bitcoin reserve plans. These efforts demonstrate a nimbleness that contrasts with the often slow-moving federal government, spotlighting the states’ enthusiasm to adopt and regulate cryptocurrencies responsibly.

The Financial Innovation and Technology Act of the 21st Century (FIT21)

Bryan touches on the Financial Innovation and Technology Act of the 21st Century (FIT21), a comprehensive legislative effort aimed at redefining securities laws in relation to digital assets. Although stalled previously, FIT21 is poised for reevaluation under the current administration, signaling a commitment to modernizing financial regulations to accommodate the unique aspects of cryptocurrencies.

The Strategic Importance of Policy Collaboration

In closing, Bryan stresses the importance of collaboration between federal and state entities in crafting robust cryptocurrency policies. The emphasis is on establishing a legal and regulatory framework that both supports innovation and protects investors. With Clark Hill’s strategic positioning, Chris and Bryan highlight their firm’s readiness to guide stakeholders through the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Conclusion

As cryptocurrencies gain momentum on the global stage, understanding the intricate dance of policy, technology, and economics becomes imperative. Stay connected with CHPS of Insight for ongoing discussions on these transformative trends in cryptocurrency and beyond.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

CIT Strikes Down Section 122 Tariffs: Big Holding, Narrow Relief, and a Refund Map for Importers

On May 7, 2026, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) held that President Trump exceeded the statutory authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 when he imposed the Administration’s temporary 10 percent “balance‑of‑payments” tariffs earlier this year.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Can an Employee Resist Submitting Their Claim into Arbitration by Using Another Employee’s Unfavorable Arbitration Outcome? The Ninth Circuit Held – No.

In O’Dell v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc., the Ninth Circuit addressed whether plaintiffs can use a procedural mechanism, non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel, to avoid enforcement of arbitration agreements—and held they cannot. The decision carries significant implications for employers facing multi-plaintiff claims.

Explore more
Legal Updates

USCIS Announces Enhanced Security Vetting and Adjudication Pause Updates

Effective April 27, 2026, USCIS implemented a new, enhanced security vetting process that has resulted in temporary “holds” on adjudications requiring fingerprint-based background checks. While not formally characterized as a blanket pause, the new process has delayed the issuance of approvals across numerous case types, including adjustment of status, asylum, naturalization, family-based petitions, humanitarian applications, and employment-based filings.

Explore more