Skip to content

Webinar: Special Education Bootcamp: Part 2

December 15, 2025
9:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees that students with disabilities are educated in the least restrictive environment (LRE) appropriate to their individual needs. Yet, translating that legal standard into everyday practice often challenges even experienced educators and administrators in a post-COVID environment presented with staff shortages, limited capacity within existing programs, and students presenting with increasing need.

In this webinar, we will unpack the legal framework surrounding LRE, including recent hearing decisions, state guidance, and practical implications for IEP development and placement decisions. Attendees will gain clarity on:

  • The federal and Michigan standards governing LRE and placement decisions.
  • How to document meaningful consideration of supplementary aids and services.
  • Common compliance pitfalls and strategies to mitigate legal risk.

Designed for special education administrators, building principals, ISD supervisors, and other district leaders, this session blends legal insight with practical tools to help teams ensure that placement determinations align with both IDEA requirements and sound educational practice.

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more