Skip to content

Matthew L. Marshall

Member

Matthew L. Marshall litigates product liability cases primarily in the life science industry, in matters involving medical device, pharmaceutical, and dietary supplement claims.

Matt is dually licensed in California and Colorado and his life science clients are as diverse as the jurisdictions in which he practices.

Matt’s medical device clients include manufacturers and distributors of dozens of different types of Class III, II, and I devices.

Matt also represents pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors in product liability cases, including sponsors and contract research and manufacturing organizations in clinical trials litigation. He also represents manufacturers, distributors, ingredient suppliers, and contract manufacturers of medical device, dietary supplements and other food products. Additionally, he represents testing labs in personal injury litigation.

In the commercial products industry, Matt represents manufacturers of OTR tires, bulk plastics, molds, pre-manufactured barns, toilet valves, appliance hoses, resurfacing coatings, and many component parts.

In the consumer products industry, Matt represents manufacturers of utility vehicles, off-road protective gear, tires, exercise equipment, smartphones, tablets and chargers, and pet supplies.

Matt has successfully tried to verdict numerous claims involving death or serious injuries including stroke, TBI, neurological deficits & paralysis, respiratory failure, SJS, burns, organ damage & failure, amputation, RSD, blindness, and other catastrophic injuries.

Matt has also served as national and regional counsel in several coordinated mass tort litigation and class actions.

* Licensed to practice law in California, pending Colorado admission.

Education

J.D., Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California, 1993
University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, 1990

Recognitions

Named among The Best Lawyers in America® for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Defendants (2025) by Best Lawyers

State Bar Licenses

California

Court Admissions

U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
U.S. District Ct., C.D. of California
U.S. District Ct, District of Colorado
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of California
U.S. District Ct., S.D. of California
Supreme Court of California
Articles
  • Co-author, “California Supreme Court holds that limitations of liability provisions are unenforceable for willful conduct under Civil Code section 1668,”  April 29, 2025
  • Co-author, “Ninth Circuit Expands Specific Jurisdiction for E-Commerce Platforms,” April 2025
  • Co-author, “Colorado Court of Appeals holds that the Felonious Killing Exception Applies to Corporations” March 21, 2025
  • Author, “New FDA Draft Guidance on Medical Product Communications: What You Need to Know,” January 20, 2017
  • “FDA Regulations, Medical Causation, and Treating Provider Depositions,” webcast co-presented by DRI’s Drug and Medical Device Committee and Young Lawyers Committee, December 12, 2013
  • “Decision Limits Exposure for Medical Device Manufacturers,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, July 9, 2013
  • “California Appellate Court Decision Favorable for Medical Device Manufacturers,” Email Alert, July 8, 2013
  • “Introducing new rules for depositions, effective Jan. 1,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, December 31, 2012
  • “Justices Limit Exposure of Foreign Businesses to US Litigation,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, July 7, 2011
  • “Supreme Court Rules that State Failure to Warn Claims Against Generic Drug Manufacturers are Preempted,” June 27, 2011
  • “The Nuts and Bolts of Product Liability Litigation,” September 2010
  • “Co-Defendants in Drug & Medical Device Litigation – Powerful Allies/Dangerous Enemies,” June 8, 2010
  • “We Said That? Navigating the Risks of a Robust Advertising, eMarketing & Promotions Program for Medical Products,” May 2010
  • “Best Practices for Managing Deposition Expenses and Achieving Predictable Legal Costs,” December 2009
  • “Product Liability and Food Contamination Seminar,” August 2002
  • “The Admissibility of Medical Device Reports in Civil Litigation, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry,” January 2001
  • “Common Sense Reform or Legislative Excess?” A Survey of Recent State Tort Reform Legislation, International Legal Strategy, Vol. IX-2, February 15, 2000

The Clark Hill approach is equally pragmatic and growth-minded, which is why we understand our clients’ toughest business challenges. Our multidisciplinary, global team of advisors focuses on smart legal solutions, delivered simply.

© 2025 Clark Hill PLC.