Kalmink  jack

Jack O. Kalmink

Of Counsel
Office

Detroit

500 Woodward Ave
Suite 3500
Detroit, MI 48226
Vcard icon Email icon Pdf icon
Fax: +13133096931
Education
J.D., cum laude, Wayne State University Law School, Detroit, Michigan, 1974
B.A., Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1969
State Bar Licenses
Michigan
Court Admissions
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Michigan
U.S. District Ct., W.D. of Michigan
Supreme Court of Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals

Jack O. Kalmink

Of Counsel

Jack O. Kalmink represents clients in the insurance, retail, and hospitality industries in litigation one environmental matters. He assists with class action and commercial litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and product liability matters. 

He practices primarily in the area of litigation, where he has experience in bench and jury trials in both state and federal courts. His responsibilities cover class action, antitrust, copyright, and tobacco litigation. His experience includes such diverse areas as aircraft accidents, product liability, personal injury, environmental contamination, industrial accidents, chemical exposure, commercial warranties, transportation litigation including freight loss and damage claims, shareholder disputes, and real estate controversies. He is primarily responsible for the defense of product liability claims made against major national and international food producers and processors. The claims are usually for personal injuries resulting from serious food contamination or container failures, such as exploding jars and bottles.

Awards/Achievements
dbusiness, Michigan's Top Lawyers in Litigation
Memberships
American Bar Association
Federal Bar Association, Civil Litigation Section
Michigan Defense Trial Counsel
Oakland County Bar Association, Employment Relations Section
State Bar of Michigan, Sections on Family Law, Labor Relations Law, Legal Economics, Negligence Law
Experiences

Jack Kalmink and Mary Kalmink represent a long-standing client of the firm who, along with other investors, invested $13,000,000 in a building project in Texas.  As an inducement to get the client to make this investment, two of the investors signed Personal Guarantees for a total of $5,000,000.  The project failed and the lenders foreclosed on the property.  The client sought to recover on the Personal Guarantees to recoup some of its losses.  The investors refused to pay on the Personal Guarantees, so Jack and Mary Kalmink filed lawsuits on behalf of their clients in federal courts in Phoenix and San Diego where the investors lived.  The San Diego investors filed a motion to dismiss the case as a matter of law.  Mary Kalmink drafted the briefs in response to the motion to dismiss.  The Judge issued a written opinion, denying the investors’ motion, thus allowing the lawsuit for $2.5 million to proceed in San Diego, and precluding a similar motion in the Phoenix lawsuit.