Skip to content

What Are Reciprocal Tariffs?

February 7, 2025

President Trump plans to announce reciprocal tariffs on many countries next week. So, what is a reciprocal tariff?

First, let’s examine tariffs in general. A tariff is a tax imposed by one country on imports of goods or merchandise from another country. In the United States, tariffs (also known as duties or levies) are paid by the importer of record. This means that a U.S. company importing goods from abroad will pay tariffs, which are a type of tax when its purchased goods enter the United States. Most countries impose tariffs on imports from abroad. Countries may impose tariffs for a variety of reasons, including to raise revenue, protect domestic industries, or address unfair trade practices, among other reasons. Within any given country, different types of products are often subject to different tariff rates. Among different countries, the tariff (or tax) rate can differ for similar products. For example, the European Union (EU), currently imposes a 10% tariff on imports of U.S. automobiles, while the United States imposes a 2.5% tariff on imports of European automobiles.  This leads us to reciprocal tariffs.

In President Trump’s words, a reciprocal tariff means that “if they tax us, we tax them the same amount.” Similarly, Howard Lutnick, Trump’s choice to lead the U.S. Commerce Department, said with respect to reciprocal tariffs that “how you treat us is how you should expect to be treated.”

If the United States imposes reciprocal tariffs, this could increase the tariff rate on many U.S. imports from abroad. On the other hand, imposing reciprocal tariffs may encourage trading partners to lower the tariff rate in their own countries to match the tariff treatment afforded by the United States.

Reports indicate that the EU will likely lower its tariffs on U.S. car imports to 2.5%, matching the tariff rate imposed by the United States. President Trump has previously identified India and Brazil as other trading partners that charge high tariffs on U.S. products.

This is a developing story.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

Nasdaq’s Proposed $5 Million MVLS Rule and NYSE American’s Proposed Listing Standard: A Structural Shift for Small-Cap Issuers

In January 2026, both Nasdaq and NYSE American proposed changes that, taken together, would materially reshape the listing landscape for smaller public companies. While each proposal addresses different stages of the listing lifecycle—continued listing for Nasdaq and initial listing for NYSE American—the combined effect signals a decisive move toward faster removal of thinly capitalized issuers and fewer remediation pathways.

Explore more
Legal Updates

March 2026 Visa Bulletin: Spring Forward!

Updates announced in the March 2026 Visa Bulletin indicate continued steady (and in some cases surprising) advancement of visa processing queues and relief from visa availability backlogs, especially in the employment-based second and third preference (EB-2 and EB-3) categories.

Explore more
Legal Updates

The Borrowed Servant Rule: Liability Risks for Contractors and Owners

Contractors – of all tiers – are often surprised to learn they may be considered a “special employer” of individuals who actually work for independent third parties—such as temporary staffing agencies or equipment rental companies—on their projects. Even more surprising, contractors (including owners who self-perform) can be held primarily responsible for the negligent acts or omissions of these third-party workers because of this “special employer” status. How can a contractor become primarily liable for someone they do not pay, do not withhold taxes for, do not provide benefits to, and who is officially employed by another company?

Explore more