Skip to content

Clark Hill Secures Summary Judgment in Wrongful Death Products Case

September 24, 2024

Matthew Marshall, Seta Sarabekian, Andre Karchemsky, and Michael Masto obtained summary judgment for an international tire and wheel manufacturing client in two related cases arising from a catastrophic workplace incident at the Port of Los Angeles involving a container handler that was improperly equipped with the client’s multi-piece wheel.

The incident resulted in the death of one mechanic and serious permanent injuries to another. The deceased mechanic’s family and the surviving mechanic each filed separate complaints for damages.

“While this was indeed a horrible accident with a tragic outcome, the evidence clearly demonstrated that the incident was entirely avoidable had the mechanics and their employer followed the mandated safety, inspection, and maintenance procedures that applied to multi-piece wheels like the one at issue in this case.” Marshall said.

The large top handler vehicle on which the wheel was installed is used to move shipping containers in port terminals and has a load capacity of over 70,000 pounds. Marshall argued to the Los Angeles County Superior Court that the client’s wheel was improperly installed on the top handler and had not been properly maintained by the terminal employer.

Due to the improper use of the wheel on this machine, and the failure to regularly inspect the wheels for damage, the rim base of the wheel had developed internal fractures that were not visible beneath the tires. While attempting to change the tire on the wheel, the mechanics failed to first deflate the tire before attempting to remove it, notwithstanding the OSHA and industry standards that required them to do so in all circumstances. Once the mechanics removed all but one of the lug nuts and clamps from the tire and wheel, the explosive force of the still-inflated tire caused the fractured wheel to separate and violently propel the tire outward into the path of both mechanics, instantly killing one mechanic and seriously injuring the other.

“This multi-piece wheel has several interlocking components that are held together tightly when the tire is inflated. If the rim components are cracked, or otherwise damaged, they won’t fit together correctly and are at risk of separating if the tire is removed without first deflating it entirely. Thus, it was imperative for the mechanics to first deflate the tire, which they sadly and inexplicably failed to do in this case,” Marshall said. “The Plaintiffs argued that the wheel manufacturer should have included warnings that the wheel at issue should not be installed on top handler machines or used in a marine environment, which, they asserted, could contribute to corrosion of the wheel, and in turn, internal cracking. Nonetheless, the court concluded there was insufficient evidence that the lack of such warnings caused the accident to occur.”

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more
Legal Updates

EPA’s New Turbine Rules Provide Air Permitting Relief for Data Centers

EPA’s Jan. 15, 2026 NSPS for combustion turbines may cut Title V permits, add NOx controls, and define temporary or mobile turbines affecting data centers nationwide.

Explore more