Skip to content

Clark Hill 2025 Commercial Real Estate Outlook: The Number One Cybersecurity Threat Facing the Real Estate Sector

April 22, 2025

When we talk to clients about cybersecurity, it tends to conjure up images of ransomware, systems that are encrypted and inaccessible, and stolen data. For the real estate sector, ransomware isn’t the largest cybersecurity threat. According to the FBI’s 2023 IC3 report on internet crime, losses across all industries related to ransomware were approximately $59.6 million. But this number is dwarfed by losses resulting from business email compromises (“BEC’s”), which accounted for almost $3 Billion in losses in 2023 across all industry sectors. The most recent statistics focusing on BEC losses with a real estate nexus show that the total losses were $446.1 million in 2022. In other words, 2022 BEC losses with a real estate nexus were 7x higher than all ransomware losses across all industries in 2023. In fact, BEC losses with a real estate nexus have risen since 2015 at an alarming rate.

It is clear that the real threat of loss facing the real estate sector is the insidious BEC.

A BEC generally involves a threat actor compromising the email account of one or more sides of a transaction and inserting fraudulent payment instructions into the interaction, thus routing an upcoming payment to an account the threat actor controls. This process can involve spoofed email domains, faked phone numbers and other ancillary tactics that help reinforce the realism of the scam. These threat actors focus on the real estate sector because of the large sums of money changing hands electronically.

For victims of BECs where funds were sent to threat actors, recovery is uncertain.  As between the company that made the payment and the company that expected it, courts generally place the risk of loss (and therefore the liability for it) on the entity in the best position to avoid the loss.  This analysis can be extremely factually specific.  Moreover, pursuit of banking or similar institutions can be complex due to the rules surrounding electronic transfers and related instructions.  In many cases, the best hope for recovery is quick reporting and coordination with appropriate law enforcement authorities.

Overall, for companies and individuals involved in real estate transactions, combatting the scourge of BEC not only involves having key cybersecurity controls in place, but also controls regarding receiving, changing, and confirming payment instructions. Equally important is to have processes and procedures in place to quickly identify payments that may have been sent to fraudulent accounts so that proper authorities and other entities can be notified.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more
Legal Updates

EPA’s New Turbine Rules Provide Air Permitting Relief for Data Centers

EPA’s Jan. 15, 2026 NSPS for combustion turbines may cut Title V permits, add NOx controls, and define temporary or mobile turbines affecting data centers nationwide.

Explore more