Skip to content

Texas Legislature Amends AED Protections

July 8, 2021

The Texas Legislative Regular Session 2021 brought us an interesting panoply of statutes that address many controversial issues. One topic that seems to largely have unanimous public support is Texas Senate Bill 199, which requires all owners of automatic external defibrillators (“AEDs”) to check them monthly.  The underlying intent of the bill is to extend additional immunity to businesses and other entities in the state.  Arguably, governmental entities already have significant protection from liability when it comes to these lifesaving devices.

In 1999 and again in 2001, the Texas Legislature passed bills to shield laypersons who use AEDs at the scene of an emergency from liability. This led to widespread usage at gyms, malls, airports, state buildings, and other businesses, saving countless lives. Advancement in AED technology allows the devices to be easy to use, and in many instances, the rescuer is not an employee but a customer or bystander. S.B. 199 extends current liability protections regarding AED usage to businesses and property owners and repeals burdensome training requirements to better align training with current AED technology.

Notably, however, the bill requires a monthly inspection of defibrillators to ensure that they are correctly placed at their designated location, reasonably appear ready for use, and do not reasonably appear to be damaged in a manner that could prevent operation.

In addition, the bill extends immunity against liability of civil damages for any entity that provides training in the use of an AED related to any of the following:

  • The prescription, acquisition, or training in the use of the automated external defibrillator; or
  • Any use, attempted use of, or failure to use the automated external defibrillator.

Any person or entity that acquires an AED and any entity that owns, occupies, manages, or is otherwise responsible for the designated location where the automated external defibrillator is placed are not liable for civil damages related to the use or attempted use of or the failure to use the AED unless the conduct is willfully or wantonly negligent.

It remains to be seen how this new bill will be interpreted to interact with other provisions that address liability and immunity, such as the Texas Tort Claims Act, which waives sovereign immunity (with exceptions, exclusions, and limits) for personal injury or death so caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit would, were it a private person, be liable to the claimant according to Texas law. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. § 101.021. Presumptively the newer and more specific language with respect to AEDs would likely prevail and preclude a governmental entity from being liable.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

Colorado Supreme Court Holds the Economic Loss Rule Does Not Bar Fraudulent Inducement Claims — Keys for Litigators and Drafters

On Jun. 23rd, the Colorado Supreme Court handed down its latest word on the economic loss rule (also called the “economic loss doctrine”), affirming a $215.2 million judgment against a contractor that concealed a known performance problem while negotiating a quarter-billion-dollar design-build agreement.

Explore more
Legal Updates

When Asylum Confidentiality Meets International Police Cooperation

International police cooperation is based on trust that participating states will act in good faith and that shared information will not be misused. US asylum law rests on a different assumption: contact with an asylum seeker’s home government can create danger. When these frameworks intersect, as they do in cases involving alerts issued by INTERPOL, tensions arise that can expose asylum seekers and complicate adjudication, and which remain largely unaddressed in law or policy.

Explore more
Legal Updates

The Changing Legal Landscape of Leasing Fees Coined “Junk Fees”

There is a changing legal landscape across the United States for multi-family property owners and management companies on leasing fees coined “junk fees.” Recently, on March 13th of 2026, the FTC proposed to commence rulemaking to address unfair and deceptive acts or practices related to advertised rent and other fees and charges in the rental housing industry.

Explore more