Skip to content

Singapore Updates COMPASS Scoring Criteria for Employment Pass Applications

November 25, 2025

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) recently announced updates to two scoring criteria under the Complementarity Assessment Framework (COMPASS) points-based framework for Employment Pass (EP) applicants.

The COMPASS framework assesses applicants based on four foundational criteria (salary, qualifications, diversity, and support for local employment) and two bonus criteria (skills bonus, a.k.a. shortage occupation list (SOL), and strategic economic priorities). Applicants must earn at least 40 points to pass COMPASS. The MOM reviews the COMPASS criteria regularly to ensure that the framework remains relevant to market conditions.

From Jan. 1, 2026, the amended requirements for the following criteria will go into effect for EP applications (both new and renewals):

  • Criterion 2 (Qualifications): The MOM updated the list of top-tier institutions awarded with 20 points, and applicants who have a degree from an institution in this list will continue to receive 20 points. The list of professional qualifications recognized as “degree-equivalent” has also been updated to include new sectors, and applicants who have relevant qualifications from an institution in this list will continue to receive 10 points.
  • Criterion 5 (SOL): The SOL has been updated to include two more occupations under the Healthcare sector, while occupations such as Cyber Risk Specialist, Cybersecurity Operations Specialist, and Product Manager (Digital) have been removed. Applicants who hold a job on this list will receive up to 20 bonus points.

In response to the above, the MOM also updated its Self-Assessment Tool (SAT) to reflect the upcoming changes for criterion 2 (Qualifications), and employers may use it to streamline pre-assessments of both new and renewal EP applications. For criterion 5 (SOL), the updated SAT will be available Dec. 1,2025.

With these changes, EP applicants may be able to earn points in areas where they previously could not, thus benefit employers by providing them with access to a broader pool of global talent.

For further information related to Singapore immigration process changes or to request an upfront SAT assessment, please reach out to Clark Hill’s APAC team at apac@clarkhill.com.

Authored by Melvin Ng, APAC/EMEA Immigration Manager

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more