Skip to content

“Natural” Refrigeration Facilities Face EPA Enforcement Under the Clean Air Act

November 19, 2021

Recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement cases against operators of ammonia refrigerant facilities highlight an imminent compliance obligation and new enforcement risk for operators of refrigeration equipment that use non-HFC refrigerant chemicals (e.g., see EPA Press Release here). Ammonia and other “natural refrigerant” chemicals have long been used in large-scale industrial freezers as alternatives to Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs and CHFCs). HFCs are being phased out or banned due to their extremely high Global Warming Potential and damage to stratospheric ozone. Thus, smaller industrial and commercial facilities (e.g., distribution warehouses and grocery stores) will need to retrofit or replace HFC systems with ammonia and other non-HFC refrigerant fluids and gases.

Depending on volumes stored or used (and due to acute toxicity, flammability, and suffocation risks), ammonia and other “natural” refrigerant operations are subject to EPA regulation and enforcement under various Clean Air Act programs. The EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68, or “RMP”), requires facilities that use or store large volumes of extremely hazardous chemicals (e.g., ammonia at > 10,000 lbs.) to create comprehensive site-specific risk management and release prevention programs. The growing substitution of ammonia for HFCs suggests that prior HFC users which have never faced or complied with RMP obligations will become subject to the RMP and therefore, increased scrutiny by EPA.

Although not subject to the RMP rules, smaller ammonia facilities (i.e., <10,000 lbs.) are still subject to the General Duty Clause under the Clean Air Act Section 112(r) requiring them to implement hazard assessment techniques, to design and maintain a safe facility, to take such steps as are necessary to prevent releases and to minimize the consequences of accidental releases. A facility’s obligations under the GDC are separate from and in addition to any RMP obligations under the Part 68 regulations. The GDC applies facility-wide, regardless of the amount of hazardous chemical stored and applies to several chemicals, not just those subject to the RMP regulations.

Given EPA’s continued focus on ammonia users, companies that become subject to RMP and GDC requirements, particularly companies that produce, store, and use natural refrigerants, should evaluate their operations to ensure that they are in compliance. Please contact a Clark Hill Environmental & Natural Resources attorney with any questions on RMP/GDC requirements and potential impacts on your business or issues in complying with these programs.

The views and opinions expressed in the article represent the view of the author and not necessarily the official view of Clark Hill PLC. Nothing in this article constitutes professional legal advice nor is intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. 

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more
Legal Updates

EPA’s New Turbine Rules Provide Air Permitting Relief for Data Centers

EPA’s Jan. 15, 2026 NSPS for combustion turbines may cut Title V permits, add NOx controls, and define temporary or mobile turbines affecting data centers nationwide.

Explore more