Skip to content

FTC Issues Final Rule on Junk Fees

December 18, 2024

On Dec. 17,  the Federal Trade Commission issued its final rule on junk fees entitled “Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees” which will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register. This rulemaking process started in 2022 with the FTC being concerned about bait-and-switch pricing for businesses that offer, display, or advertise prices for lodging, including short-term rentals and live events, whereby businesses do not disclose the all-in pricing to consumers before consumers commit to pay. The Rule defines “Covered Good or Service” to include live-event tickets or short-term lodging, including temporary sleeping accommodations at a hotel, motel, inn, short-term rental, vacation rental, or other place of lodging. After much debate regarding the possible sweeping application of this proposed rule, the FTC’s final definition of covered goods and services effectively excluded a number of types of businesses from the Rule’s applicability, notably restaurants, where “service charges” have become quite common.

Businesses must now consider all fees charged to consumers and ensure that the total price for the goods or services is the most conspicuous of dollar figures displayed and not hidden. “Total Price” means the maximum total of all fees or charges a consumer must pay for any goods or services and any mandatory ancillary goods or services, except that government charges, shipping charges, and fees or charges for any optional ancillary goods or services may be excluded. In any advertisement, the total price must be the most prominent and include all mandatory fees. The FTC addressed some concerns with the applicability of the Rule to specific types of fees (e.g. contingent fees, ticket service fees, dynamic pricing, bundled fees, promotional offers, etc.) with the overarching theme being transparency to the consumers as to the total amount charged (subject to allowable exclusions as described above).  Misleading fees and statements are prohibited. Businesses should review pricing and advertising structures to determine steps which should be taken now to ensure compliance before this final Rule becomes effective.

This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Event

Clark Hill's Commercial Real Estate Symposium – Dallas, Texas

Join Clark Hill’s Commercial Real Estate attorneys and industry professionals for a timely and dynamic program in Dallas, focusing on the latest challenges and top trends in the CRE industry.

Explore more
Legal Updates

What Is Likely the Weakest Provision in Your Multi-State Lease?

Using one eminent domain lease clause across states risks lost value. Learn how state laws should reflect notice and just compensation for better protection.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Critical Risk Mitigation Provisions for Design Contracts — Part 1: Waiver of Consequential Damages

An essential element of architect and engineer contracts with their clients is the treatment of risk sharing between the parties. Design professionals who are typically simply providing services for a fee, and who are not investors who will share in the profits of a successful project, can ill-afford to expose themselves to unlimited liability for negligent errors and omissions in the performance of their services. Architects and engineers would argue that it is fundamentally unfair to expose them to unlimited downside risk when they do not directly participate in the upside profit potential of the projects they design. Owners and developers would counter that this is why design professionals carry professional liability insurance. But even simple design errors can lead to liability that is many times greater than the amount of such insurance.

Explore more