Skip to content

Clark Hill's Alex Yastremski Guides NFT Platform Through Fundraising Round

September 24, 2021

San Francisco attorney Alex Yastremski recently helped a new NFT marketplace that specializes in curated digital collectibles built by and for the electronic music industry through a $5 million private seed fundraising round.

According to a Music Business Worldwide article, Yastremski’s client, RCRDSHP, offers limited edition collectibles built on the Flow blockchain that “encapsulate a unique aspect of an artist, label, or festival’s musical worlds.” The article stated that the platform launched in mid-August by releasing more than 5,000 “Genesis Packs” made up of electronic and dance music digital collectibles, and the release sold out in a matter of hours.

Yastremski led a team of Clark Hill attorneys who helped the founders of RCRDSHP through formation, investor negotiation and documentation, IP protection, and commercial contract preparation. The group is also advising the NFT platform on its terms and conditions and advises RCRDSHP on the generation, marketing, and sales of NFTs on the company’s proprietary music-NFT marketplace.

“Private seed fundraising in the blockchain start-up space requires corporate and securities review, like other industries,” Yastremski said. “In the NFT space, there are unique legal considerations that consumers and platforms should be aware of.”

Creating an NFT

Yastremski explained that the creation and sale of an NFT can be broken down into two parts. The blockchain handles the minting and accounting of the NFT first, and the second component is the initial sale and resale process.

“Minting platforms are doubling up as marketplaces to provide artists and other NFT content providers with a one-stop shop for a full suite of services. NFT servicers straddle the chain between an artist (i.e. vendor) and all initial and subsequent purchasers of the NFTs. The legal issues involved include formulating an appropriate set of terms and conditions to govern such relationships, balancing the competing interests of the content provider, the initial buyer, of each subsequent seller and buyer in subsequent downstream transactions.”

On fractionalization within the NFT industry, Yastremski said there remains potential for securities issues ahead.

“Given the significant sums that some NFTs are selling for, fractionalization would allow smaller investors to purchase interests in an NFT bringing to bear the regulatory concern that they may be securities,” Yastremski said. “Until the SEC’s views are clarified, uncertainty about whether NFTs are securities is likely to persist.”

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Using “Schedule A” Litigation to Combat Online Trademark Infringement

In today’s digital world, trademark infringement is a significant concern for businesses aiming to protect their brand identity. Accordingly, it is important for businesses to implement a multifaceted online enforcement strategy to protect their intellectual property rights. Among the various legal avenues available to combat counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks, “Schedule A” lawsuits, which are most often filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, have emerged as a powerful tool. As intellectual property attorneys at Clark Hill, we regularly help businesses secure and enforce their IP rights. Here, we will explore what Schedule A trademark infringement litigation entails, how it works, and why it’s essential for companies to understand this avenue for enforcing their legal rights.

Explore more