Skip to content

Clark Hill Attorney Matthew Goldstein Quoted in World Export Control Review Journal

August 11, 2021

Clark Hill export control and sanctions attorney Matthew Goldstein was quoted in the July-August 2021 edition of WorldECR Journal on the U.S. State Department Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Blue Lantern pre- and post-license end use verification report for 2020.

Matthew is experienced challenging State Department actions in the administration of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and explained how companies can unwittingly land on DDTC’s watch list.

“DDTC designated companies as ‘unreliable recipients’ and placed them on the DDTC Watch List in cases where no government visit occurred,” said Goldstein. “So companies should immediately respond to US embassy personnel requests to schedule a Blue Lantern check. You do not want to miss a request.”

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

Nasdaq’s Proposed $5 Million MVLS Rule and NYSE American’s Proposed Listing Standard: A Structural Shift for Small-Cap Issuers

In January 2026, both Nasdaq and NYSE American proposed changes that, taken together, would materially reshape the listing landscape for smaller public companies. While each proposal addresses different stages of the listing lifecycle—continued listing for Nasdaq and initial listing for NYSE American—the combined effect signals a decisive move toward faster removal of thinly capitalized issuers and fewer remediation pathways.

Explore more
Legal Updates

March 2026 Visa Bulletin: Spring Forward!

Updates announced in the March 2026 Visa Bulletin indicate continued steady (and in some cases surprising) advancement of visa processing queues and relief from visa availability backlogs, especially in the employment-based second and third preference (EB-2 and EB-3) categories.

Explore more
Legal Updates

The Borrowed Servant Rule: Liability Risks for Contractors and Owners

Contractors – of all tiers – are often surprised to learn they may be considered a “special employer” of individuals who actually work for independent third parties—such as temporary staffing agencies or equipment rental companies—on their projects. Even more surprising, contractors (including owners who self-perform) can be held primarily responsible for the negligent acts or omissions of these third-party workers because of this “special employer” status. How can a contractor become primarily liable for someone they do not pay, do not withhold taxes for, do not provide benefits to, and who is officially employed by another company?

Explore more