Skip to content

A Q&A Conversation With Rick Fanning

November 7, 2023

Labor and Employment Senior Counsel Rick Fanning has had an eventful start to his Clark Hill career since joining the firm in May. 

Fanning’s work in collective bargaining has had him focused on the United Auto Workers’ negotiations with the “Big Three” Detroit automakers. He recently discussed his practice and what he and the Clark Hill automotive and labor and employment teams can do to help clients in collective bargaining matters.  

To get started, can you first share what brought you to Clark Hill this year?

The firm has an excellent reputation, and I can remember when it was purely a Detroit firm and its growth and expansion have been tremendous. I knew our Detroit Member-in-Charge Maria Dwyer from earlier in our careers and she has always been such a champion for the firm and continued to tell me to work at Clark Hill. We finally had that conversation and I joined shortly after.

How do you describe your legal practice?

I focus on labor and employment with a greater emphasis on labor relations at the moment. I assist clients during collective bargaining, with grievance and arbitration matters, and interpreting bargaining agreements. I also counsel clients in union and non-union settings on all matters of employment compliance. I like to say that I work with the alphabet soup of employment law, Title VII, the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Michigan’s Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act, all of those things. 

What makes me unique is that I spent six years in an HR executive position for a large organization, so I can also bring the point of view of an HR leader. I’ve been a client and have received legal advice. With that background, I can approach matters in a more meaningful way so that the legal advice I give is also a practical solution the client can implement. If I describe a solution that’s appropriate for a large international company to an auto supplier with two locations, that might not be workable, and I wouldn’t have helped them.  

How is your practice incorporated into the automotive industry team?

Right now, I’m mostly working with a lot of our automobile clients. They’re often unionized and they often have needs that require an answer that addresses collective bargaining agreements and other laws like FMLA, ADA, and worker’s compensation. The employer needs to comply with all of those and they need to comply perfectly every time. I help clients through those situations in ways that maintain and hopefully improve their union-management relationships.  

What can you and your group offer to clients in collective bargaining situations?

We want to be the best partner we can with clients by understanding their needs and what their capacities are. We want to help them move forward in ways that benefit them and are legally compliant. Oftentimes, it’s understanding that you can go in and get a win, but you could also damage the relationship a company may have with its unions. After I’ve done my work, the next day the company’s HR team needs to work with the union, and I want to make sure that’s still a compatible environment. 

Subscribe for the latest

Subscribe

Related

Legal Updates

California Announces Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with GM Over Connected Vehicle Data

On May 8, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with several California district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors and its connected vehicle service OnStar. The settlement resolves allegations that the companies violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Unfair Competition Law, and the California False Advertising Law by collecting and selling connected vehicle data without adequate consumer notice or consent.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Long Saga of Colorado AI Act Appears to Have Come to Close With Revised Law

Ever since its initial passage into law in 2024, the Colorado AI Act has been a lightning rod for controversy and calls for change. Over the ensuing two years, multiple attempts to amend the law were floated and proposed by consumer and industry groups. The implementation of the law itself was delayed several times to allow for such changes, with Governor Jared Polis calling a special session of the legislature last August to specifically address potential changes. All of those attempts appear to have culminated in Senate Bill 189 having passed both the Colorado House (57-6) and Senate (34-1) this week. The bill next heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis where it is expected to be signed into law and to take effect as of January of 2027.

Explore more
Legal Updates

Using “Schedule A” Litigation to Combat Online Trademark Infringement

In today’s digital world, trademark infringement is a significant concern for businesses aiming to protect their brand identity. Accordingly, it is important for businesses to implement a multifaceted online enforcement strategy to protect their intellectual property rights. Among the various legal avenues available to combat counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks, “Schedule A” lawsuits, which are most often filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, have emerged as a powerful tool. As intellectual property attorneys at Clark Hill, we regularly help businesses secure and enforce their IP rights. Here, we will explore what Schedule A trademark infringement litigation entails, how it works, and why it’s essential for companies to understand this avenue for enforcing their legal rights.

Explore more