United States Supreme Court Upholds Michigan's Constitutional Ban Against Affirmative Action
In a six to two decision, the United States Supreme Court upheld Michigan's constitutional prohibition against affirmative action. SCHUETTE v. BAMN , 572 U. S. ___ (2014). Article I, § 26 of Michigan's Constitution prohibits public universities, colleges, and school districts from discriminating against or granting preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. The Supreme Court reversed the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals eight to seven en banc decision, which invalidated § 26 as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees individuals with equal protection of the laws.
In passing § 26, the voters of Michigan prohibited consideration of race in public decision-making, which arguably embraced the principle of equal protection. Justices Scalia and Thomas captured the fundamental dilemma presented by this case in their concurring opinion, "Does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbid what its text plainly requires ?"
In writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy stated that the case was not about the merits of affirmative action. Instead, it was about whether issues involving affirmative action are reserved solely for judicial determination or whether they are subject to the democratic process. The majority, including Justice Breyer who crossed the ideological divide, favored the democratic process. Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissent in defense of affirmative action in which Justice Ginsburg joined.
The Supreme Court's decision removes any legal doubt as to the validity of Michigan's Constitutional Ban against affirmative action. Please contact your Clark Hill Education School Law attorney if you have questions or want more information regarding the Schuette decision.
The Current Whipsaw in Labor Law: Recent NLRB Developments and the Direction of the Biden Administration
While President Biden makes historic decisions, such as the firing of the NLRB’s General Counsel in January, many employers are wondering what impact “Biden’s NLRB” will have on their workforce. As new board members are confirmed, what changes should employers expect from the new NLRB?
FAQs: Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines and the Automotive & Manufacturing Industries
Join us for a presentation where we will share the considerations, implications, and answer your frequently asked questions surrounding the implementation of mandatory COVID-19 vaccines.