Clark Hill

Education Law Alert  March 25, 2010 

 

Education Law Practice Group Leader

 

John L. Gierak

248.988.5845

 

 

Contributor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Education Law Practice Group
Members

Dana L. Abrahams

James M. Crowley

John L. Gierak

Marshall W. Grate

Mark W. McInerney

William A. Moore 

Jeremy S. Motz
Nancy L. Mullett

Kevin M. Nalu

Barbara A. Ruga

Roger A. Swets

Alan D. Szuma

Joseph E. Turner, Jr. 

Joseph B. Urban

Ann L. VanderLaan 

 

 

Education Law Alert 

 

PROBATIONARY TEACHER NONRENEWALS
by Barbara A. Ruga

 

Based on research conducted by the New Teacher Project, www.tntp.org, school districts would see a significant increase in student achievement if the bottom quartile of ineffective teachers were properly exited or supported to improve their teaching and learning skills.  Research of New York City and Dallas students' math scores show that enhancing teacher effectiveness makes dramatic differences in achievement.  Which brings us to the subject of probationary teacher nonrenewals because it is that time of year again.

 

Teachers in their probationary periods (2 or 4 years) are subject to contract discontinuance upon action by the Board of Education and notice of Board action to affected teachers.  To be timely, if the probationary teacher's service is measured on the school year rule, notice must be delivered to the teacher not later than May 1, 2010.  If the probationary teacher started teaching after the first scheduled day of the school year, the anniversary year rule applies and a different deadline is applicable.

 

In order to support an action of contract nonrenewal, the Tenure Act requires that a probationary teacher's evaluation process include:

· an individualized development plan developed by appropriate administrative personnel in consultation with the teacher

 

· at least two observations with 60 calendar days between the first and last observation

 

· a final "year end" evaluation (that cannot be done too early)

 

· assessment of progress towards the IDP within the final evaluation.

Failure to satisfy the above requirements means the teacher is legally deemed satisfactory.

 

While collective bargaining requirements may complicate an individual district's position, if the failure to re-employ a probationary teacher is not expressly excluded from the grievance arbitration procedures, the Tenure Commission will generally not second guess evaluator's decisions to discontinue probationary teacher contracts as long as the procedures are satisfied and timely action taken.
 

Spring break can complicate a principal's already busy life, and so we take this opportunity to remind our clients of these timelines and requirements.  If you have any questions, or require assistance in preparing the necessary documents for board action, please contact your Clark Hill attorney.

 

 

For further information about the content of this Education Law Update, please contact John Gierak or Barbara Ruga. To find out more about Clark Hill and our Education Law team, visit clarkhill.com or call 800.949.3124

 

 

Safe Unsubscribe

This email was sent to jhenderson@clarkhill.com by jhenderson@clarkhill.com.

Clark Hill PLC | 500 Woodward Ave | Suite 3500 | Detroit | MI | 48226