Clark Hill

Education Law Alert  February 5, 2010 

 

Education Law Practice Group Leader

 

248.988.5847

 

 

Contributors

 

Education Law Practice Group
Members

Dana L. Abrahams

James M. Crowley

John L. Gierak

Marshall W. Grate

Robert A. Lusk 

Mark W. McInerney

William A. Moore 

Jeremy S. Motz
Nancy L. Mullett

Kevin M. Nalu

Barbara A. Ruga
Kevin T. Sutton

Roger A. Swets

Alan D. Szuma

Joseph E. Turner, Jr. 

Joseph B. Urban

Ann L. VanderLaan 

 

 

Education Law Alert 

 

 

 

Court of Appeals Rules that School Employees' Personal and Union-Related Emails Are Not Public Records Under Freedom of Information Act
by Kristin Bellar


In a published opinion issued on January 26, 2010, the Court of Appeals held that personal or union-related employee email messages "retained" on a public body's server or backup system are not necessarily public records as defined by the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA").


In Howell Education Association, et al, v Howell Board of Education, et al, Docket No. 288977, Chetly Zarko, a "right-to-work" activist investigating how unions use school districts' computer systems, submitted a FOIA request to Howell Public Schools ("HPS"), seeking email messages sent between certain employees who were also union officials for the Howell Education Association ("HEA").  HEA and the employees ("Plaintiffs"), with the cooperation of HPS and the Howell Board of Education ("Defendants"), requested a declaratory judgment that the personal emails were not public records and, even if they were, certain exemptions would apply to permit the public body (the school district) to exempt them from disclosure under FOIA.


The trial court held that any emails generated through the school's electronic mail system that are retained or stored by the district are public records subject to FOIA.  Plaintiffs (the union) appealed this decision.


The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision.  The Court of Appeals held that emails that are inherently personal and unrelated to the functioning of the public body and emails between union officials regarding union business are not "public records," because they are not related to or necessary for the functioning of the public body.  Moreover, the existence of an "acceptable use policy" prohibiting use of the public body's email server for personal use did not automatically transform personal and union-related emails into "public records."  The Court of Appeals did note that a personal or union email message could be converted into a "public record" if, for example, an employee was disciplined for violation of an acceptable use policy.  Then, the use of those emails would be related to one of the school's official functions: the discipline of the employee.  Under those circumstances, the emails would become public records.


According to a January 28, 2010 National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. news release, Mr. Zarko intends to appeal this matter to the Michigan Supreme Court, with legal assistance provided by the Foundation.  In the meantime, since the decision has been designated for publication, it represents binding legal authority.

 

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact the author or your Clark Hill Education attorney.  

All articles are also posted on the Clark Hill Website for future reference and can be accessed by visiting www.clarkhill.com.

  




 

 

For further information about the content of this Education Law Update, please contact Robert A. Lusk at 248-988-5847. To find out more about Clark Hill and our Education Law team, visit clarkhill.com or call 800.949.3124

 

 

Safe Unsubscribe

This email was sent to jhenderson@clarkhill.com by jhenderson@clarkhill.com.

Clark Hill PLC | 500 Woodward Ave | Suite 3500 | Detroit | MI | 48226